2019 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icaiic.2019.8669025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for Polar Codes over Flat Fading Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the methods, the DIR-Net method with attention-based denoising and attention-based decoding was denoted as “dno_dec”. In order to evaluate the decoder performance, we used the DIR-Net method without denoiser as the comparison, which is denoted as “only_dec”, whereas “only_fc_dec” denotes the fully connected decoder proposed in [ 27 ], which does not contain a denoiser, and “fc_dec” denotes the addition of the attention-based denoiser in our paper to [ 27 ]. To further evaluate the performance of the attention-based denoiser and decoder, we compared it with the residual decoder, which was proposed in [ 29 ], denoted as “res_dec”.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the methods, the DIR-Net method with attention-based denoising and attention-based decoding was denoted as “dno_dec”. In order to evaluate the decoder performance, we used the DIR-Net method without denoiser as the comparison, which is denoted as “only_dec”, whereas “only_fc_dec” denotes the fully connected decoder proposed in [ 27 ], which does not contain a denoiser, and “fc_dec” denotes the addition of the attention-based denoiser in our paper to [ 27 ]. To further evaluate the performance of the attention-based denoiser and decoder, we compared it with the residual decoder, which was proposed in [ 29 ], denoted as “res_dec”.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the speed of each decoding technique more comprehensively, we test the denoiser speed, decoder speed, and denoiser-decoder speed of DIR-Net method with different code lengths, including (16, 8), (32, 16), (64, 32), (128, 64), and (256, 128) polar codes. To further evaluate the speed of DIR-Net, it is compared with traditional SC algorithms, BP algorithms, and deep learning-based methods only_fc_dec [ 27 ], FC_Decoder [ 28 ], and res_dec [ 29 ]. The decoding time for each method listed in Table 3 .…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the realm of wireless communication ML has recently been adapted for many uses such as equalization [5], spectrum sensing [6], channel coding [7], signal classification [8], etc. One important use of ML in wireless communication is modulation classification (MC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] the authors considered a deep feed-forward neural network for polar codes and investigated its decoding performances with respect to numerous configurations: the number of hidden layers, the number of nodes for each layer, and activation functions. Later, more discussion on the activation function of the neural network for decoding polar codes and decoding under Reighlay fading channels using NND can be found in [12] and [13], respectively. In [14], the authors compared the decoding performance of three types of neural network, i.e., multi-layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) with the same parameter magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%