2019
DOI: 10.7554/elife.44558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoys provide a scalable platform for the identification of plant E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate circadian function

Abstract: The circadian clock relies on regulated degradation of clock proteins to maintain rhythmicity. Despite this, we know few components that mediate protein degradation. This is due to high levels of functional redundancy within plant E3 ubiquitin ligase families. In order to overcome this issue and discover E3 ubiquitin ligases that control circadian function, we generated a library of transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing dominant-negative ‘decoy’ E3 ubiquitin ligases. We determined their effects on the circa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have noted previously that complex formation between E3 ubiquitin ligases and their homologs may be a common feature of this class of proteins, and the ability of ZTL, FKF1, and LKP2 to heterodimerize has been previously reported [13,14,31,36,37]. We demonstrate that the homodimerization takes place between the LOV and Kelch repeat domains, suggesting that the interactions between ZTL and FKF1/LKP2 may also occur in this manner.…”
Section: Ztl Kelch Repeat Interaction Profilessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have noted previously that complex formation between E3 ubiquitin ligases and their homologs may be a common feature of this class of proteins, and the ability of ZTL, FKF1, and LKP2 to heterodimerize has been previously reported [13,14,31,36,37]. We demonstrate that the homodimerization takes place between the LOV and Kelch repeat domains, suggesting that the interactions between ZTL and FKF1/LKP2 may also occur in this manner.…”
Section: Ztl Kelch Repeat Interaction Profilessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We included CCA1p::Luciferase plants that express FKF1, LKP2, and ZTL decoys (LOV-Kelch fusion proteins which lack the F-box domain), which we have analyzed previously [13], and wild type CCA1p::Luciferase parental plants, as controls. In order to compare results from experiments performed separately, we use the difference between the period or flowering time of the individual T1 transgenic and the average period or flowering time of the concurrent wild type control plants for our statistical analyses [36,37]. The data generated in these experiments is displayed in Figure 1 and Tables 1 and 2.…”
Section: Expression Of the Lov Domain Of Lov/f-box/kelch Proteins Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2C), we engineered a dominant-negative (DN) form of SUSA2, where the F-box domain (residues 40-86) was deleted, likely abolishing the interaction of the F-box with SKP1/ASKs in the SCF E3 ligase complex but maintaining its interaction with its substrate, preventing self-ubiquitination and degradation of itself and its substrate. Such an approach has been used successfully for studying F-box proteins previously 32,33 . As expected, the DN-SUSA2-FLAG expressed well ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, deleting the F‐box domains of redundant F‐box proteins ZEITLUPE (ZTL), FLAVIN‐BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F‐BOX1 (FKF1), or LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 (LKP2) leads to decoy versions of E3s, enabling genetic analysis of these redundant E3s and their substrates (Lee et al , ). Decoy versions of RING‐type E3s can be similarly generated by deleting the RING domain as in the case of redundant MAC3A (PUB59) and MAC3B (PUB60) (Feke et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%