2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconvolution analysis of dopant depth profile of Si at AlGaAs/GaAs interface using Al composition profile as reference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Nowadays, device size is scaled down, which requires considerable effort on the improvement of SIMS apparatuses, in order to realize high sensitivity, high lateral resolution and in-depth resolution. 1,2) However, depth resolution is governed by several phenomena inherent to the action of the primary ion in the substrate and their incorporation in the matrix. The main physical mechanism responsible for the degradation of depth resolution is collisional mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) Nowadays, device size is scaled down, which requires considerable effort on the improvement of SIMS apparatuses, in order to realize high sensitivity, high lateral resolution and in-depth resolution. 1,2) However, depth resolution is governed by several phenomena inherent to the action of the primary ion in the substrate and their incorporation in the matrix. The main physical mechanism responsible for the degradation of depth resolution is collisional mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, recent years have seen the development of several deconvolution algorithms that show an improvement in depth resolution without taking into account noise effects. [2][3][4][5][6] Indeed, the consequence of noise in numerical processing is the generation of artifacts and oscillations that limit the accuracy of results and their interpretations. Moreover, none of these algorithms have been used widely because the calculations are typically complicated and time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depth profiles of Si in AlGaAs/GaAs epilayers could be deconvoluted without RM. 325 The atomic level abruptness of the Al concentration at the interface was confirmed to be within 0.5 nm using thickness fringe-field TEM. The DRF derived from the Al profile using 2 keV Cs 1 bombardment and detection of AlAs À ions allowed the true Si distribution to be calculated from the AsSi À signals.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…So, the interfacial effect exists between the different layers, such as the adjacent layers of glass-Si 3 N 4 , Si 3 N 4 -Ga 0.5 Al 0.5 As and Ga 0.5 Al 0.5 As-GaAs. [19,20] Due to the discrepancy of material performance, inter-diffusion of different kinds of particles has been observed. Specifically, a similar interface makes Al-ion diffuse gradually between the Ga 0.5 Al 0.5 As and GaAs layers.…”
Section: Mechanism Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%