2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing the notion of blame in corporate failure

Abstract: Corporate failure is the subject of considerable academic debate since the 1960s. Failure in the retail sector receives less attention however. This paper addresses the notion of blame in corporate failure. Reference to A Goldberg and Sons, a failed retailer, exemplifies the discussion. Prior to bankruptcy in 1990, this firm was a successful Scottish department store and clothing retailer. The study takes a historical approach, using indepth interviews, archival material, and other secondary data sources. Find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, in line with the results of the study by Wentzel (2009), it is conceivable that the employee is perceived as a “typical” example of an employee (e.g., as a part of the company), even when there is a relationship based on CHE, and thus the failure of the employee is directly attributed to the company. The process of blame attribution (Pal et al, 2011) can provide another possible explanation for the present result. Accordingly, due to human nature, people tend to blame a single person instead of organizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, in line with the results of the study by Wentzel (2009), it is conceivable that the employee is perceived as a “typical” example of an employee (e.g., as a part of the company), even when there is a relationship based on CHE, and thus the failure of the employee is directly attributed to the company. The process of blame attribution (Pal et al, 2011) can provide another possible explanation for the present result. Accordingly, due to human nature, people tend to blame a single person instead of organizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In this context, literature also refers to the term blame attribution (Aquino, Tripp, & Bies, 2001). In accordance with Shaver (1985) and Pal, Medway, and Byrom (2011), the occurrence (and target) of blame attribution is a process and is based on multiple factors. These factors include the consequences of a failure, the attribution of causality, the dimensions of responsibility, and the determinants of blameworthiness (Pal et al, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, and in line with other qualitative studies in the area (e.g. Cope, 2011; Pal et al , 2011; Singh et al , 2015), the cases selected were purposive by nature, meaning that any individual that filled the pre-requisites would be of significance for the research project. An effort was made to not contain the search within a single country, in particular the concentration within a single region in Europe, although admittedly being difficulty due to the selection criteria defined and the very own personal nature that study subject demands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we anticipate that HR who is doing poorly in school may justify his or her inadequate performance with high workload and stress, whereas the teacher (the observer) tends to attribute it to inability or laziness. Attribution theory has also been used to explain aspects of people's behavior in organizations (see, e.g., Björkman, Stahl, & Vaara, 2007;Fontinha, Chambel, & De Cuyper, 2012;Johnson, Lenartowicz, & Apud, 2006;Pal, Medway, & Byrom, 2011). In the context of research on Indian organizations, too, recent research utilizes attribution theory as a lens to discuss varied HR and organizational-related areas (see, e.g., Gok, Deshpande, Deshpande, & Hunter, 2012;Lakshman, 2008Lakshman, , 2013.…”
Section: Hr Professionals As Implementers and Internal Customers Of Hmentioning
confidence: 99%