2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision support system for blockchain (DLT) platform selection based on ITU recommendations: A systematic literature review approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They integrated the MCDM with the rough set. Kubler et al [33] developed an MCDM methodology for selecting the best blockchain platform. They used the AHP and TOPISS methods.…”
Section: Decision-making In Blockchain Platform Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They integrated the MCDM with the rough set. Kubler et al [33] developed an MCDM methodology for selecting the best blockchain platform. They used the AHP and TOPISS methods.…”
Section: Decision-making In Blockchain Platform Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While designing the systems displayed in Figures 1, 2 and 3, important considerations should be made. One is the selection of the blockchain platform [12]. In this case, we recommend a permissioned platform, such as Hyperledger Fabric, which ensures controlled access to and privacy of sensitive data as only authorised parties can join, write, read, and commit in the network [13].…”
Section: Blockchain-enabled System: Transparency Traceability and Coo...mentioning
confidence: 99%