2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-15959-6_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-Making Styles and Decision Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It adheres to a three-point Likert Scale characterized by the responses "True for Me" which is equivalent to two (2) points, "Sometimes True for Me" equivalent to one (1) point, and "Not True for Me" which is zero (0) or no point. According to Isaksson et al, (2014) [23], the tests of reliability of subscales in different USA, Australia and other countries have shown the following Cronbach's alpha: vigilance 0.65-0.80; hypervigilance 0.61-0.74; buck-passing 0.77-0.87; and procrastination 0.70-0.81 (4,(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: • Instrument/s Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It adheres to a three-point Likert Scale characterized by the responses "True for Me" which is equivalent to two (2) points, "Sometimes True for Me" equivalent to one (1) point, and "Not True for Me" which is zero (0) or no point. According to Isaksson et al, (2014) [23], the tests of reliability of subscales in different USA, Australia and other countries have shown the following Cronbach's alpha: vigilance 0.65-0.80; hypervigilance 0.61-0.74; buck-passing 0.77-0.87; and procrastination 0.70-0.81 (4,(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: • Instrument/s Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Bavolar and Orosovalooked [8] into decision-making styles in the context of Slovak high schools and universities. Using the Adult Decisionmaking Competence Scale and the Decision-making Styles Questionnaire developed by Scott and Bruce in 1995 [45], it was suggested that certain decisionmaking styles were significant predictors of the general decision-making competency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu durum, turizm öğrencilerinin karar verme tarzlarının çalışanlarınki ile uyumlu olduğunu göstermektedir. Çıktı açısından ise karar verme tarzlarından en avantajlı olanlarının rasyonel ve sezgisel, en dezavantajlı olanının ise kaçıngan (Bavolar, 2023) olduğu dikkate alındığında, turizm fakültesi öğrencilerinin verecekleri kararların avantajlı olma ihtimallerinin yüksek olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Yine Bavolar'ın (2023) bakış açısından ve sektör profesyonellerine yönelik yukarıda belirtilen araştırmaların sonuçlarından hareketle, turizm öğrencilerinin özellikle rasyonel, sezgisel ve kaçıngan karar verme eğilimleri ile ilgili bulguları kısmen destekleyen bazı araştırmalar tespit edilmiştir.…”
Section: Sonuç Ve öNeri̇lerunclassified
“…Firstly, regarding context-individual-related factors, the interpretation of the same external stimulus may be interpreted differently according to the individual’s characteristics [ 12 , 13 ]. For instance, our choice behaviour can also be influenced by individual differences in our decision-making style [ 14 , 15 ], which are usually investigated through self-report questionnaires, such as the General Decision-Making Scale (GDMS) [ 16 , 17 ], which allows profiling decision-makers according to different decision styles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%