1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7439(98)00159-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision criteria for soft independent modelling of class analogy applied to near infrared data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both supervised chemometric models demonstrated a high recognition rate, with a DFA dendrogram model performing a bit better than SIMCA. This usually happens because the classifier in the SIMCA model sometimes identifies samples (i.e., spectra) as members of multiple groups (11). In this study, the SIMCA model had a 97% average recognition rate, indicating the good reliability of our global Raman spectroscopy-based classification model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both supervised chemometric models demonstrated a high recognition rate, with a DFA dendrogram model performing a bit better than SIMCA. This usually happens because the classifier in the SIMCA model sometimes identifies samples (i.e., spectra) as members of multiple groups (11). In this study, the SIMCA model had a 97% average recognition rate, indicating the good reliability of our global Raman spectroscopy-based classification model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…SIMCA is a supervised chemometric model describing a plane (for two PCs), and the mean orthogonal distance of training data from this specific plane is calculated as residual standard deviation and subsequently employed to determine a critical distance (on the basis of F distribution with a 95% confidence interval) for the identification of an analyte (i.e., bacteria) to the species level (11). Prediction data were subsequently projected into each PC model, and the residual distances were calculated (whether below the statistical limit for a specific class or not) to determine the class to which the prediction data belong.…”
Section: Discriminatory Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New measurements are considered to belong to the class if their Euclidean distance towards the constructed PC space is not significantly larger than the Euclidean distance of the class objects towards their PC space (de Maesschalck et al, 1999). In our research, 30 DEEJ samples and 45 OEJ (Ejiao (Colla Corii Asini)) samples were used as the calibration set to establish the PC space and the corresponding Euclidean distance.…”
Section: Simca Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term Soft is derived from this point. Within this framework, the outlier values of the data are eliminated (8). A level of statistical significance is calculated according to a F test (5).…”
Section: The Advantages and Disadvantages Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%