2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized feedback controllers for multi-agent teams in environments with obstacles

Abstract: Abstract-We propose a method for synthesizing decentralized feedback controllers for a team of multiple heterogeneous agents navigating a known environment with obstacles. The controllers are designed to drive agents with limited team state information to goal sets while avoiding collisions and maintaining specified proximity constraints. The method, its successful application to nonholonomic agents in dynamic simulation and experimentation, and its limitations are presented in this paper.Index Terms-Decentral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques include using a set of reactive behaviors (Balch and Arkin 1998), potential fields (Balch and Hybinette 2000;Sabattini et al 2011), abstractions (Michael et al 2008;Ayanian and Kumar 2010a), decentralized feedback laws with graph theory (Desai et al 2001), proximity constraints (Ayanian and Kumar 2010b) and stochastic planning (Urcola et al 2017), to name a few. In contrast, our method automatically optimizes for the formation parameters natively in three-dimensional dynamic environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques include using a set of reactive behaviors (Balch and Arkin 1998), potential fields (Balch and Hybinette 2000;Sabattini et al 2011), abstractions (Michael et al 2008;Ayanian and Kumar 2010a), decentralized feedback laws with graph theory (Desai et al 2001), proximity constraints (Ayanian and Kumar 2010b) and stochastic planning (Urcola et al 2017), to name a few. In contrast, our method automatically optimizes for the formation parameters natively in three-dimensional dynamic environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayanian and Kumar [1], Desaraju and How [12], and Bhattacharya et al [7] developed CPP planners that could plan for systems where multiple teams form and persist for significant durations. Ayanian and Kumar [1] solved problems where robots must remain in close proximity to the other robots in its team by searching the prepares graph of controllers in a sequential composition framework [8], but this algorithm did not scale well to larger numbers of robots.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 shows a MATLAB simulation of the automaton synthesized for Example 1; a video accompanies this paper. The naive controllers used for simulating motion for each robot set the robot's velocity towards the centroid of the next region -in future work, these will be replaced in physical experiments with atomic controllers such as those constructed in [2].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors provided a technique for constructing atomic controllers that guarantee collision-avoidance and deadlock prevention for teams of robots. This work combined the production of high-level control in [12] with the low-level controller synthesis described in [2]. The atomic controllers described guide multiple robots to a goal set while avoiding collisions with obstacles and other robots, and can be reused to accommodate many different high-level tasks in the same workspace.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%