Daily use of time, personal characteristics and experienced well-being

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to seek to provide a more comprehensive view of the determinants of experienced well-being by incorporating personal characteristics suggested to be significant predictors of global well-being, such as income, materialism, religiosity, community mindedness and sleep quality (Diener et al., 1999; Frey and Stutzer, 2002), as well as time-use activities (Kahneman and Krueger, 2006) and contextual elements, such as day of the week (Csikszentmihalyi and Hunter, 2003; Kahneman et al., 2004a) and the presence of companions, into a single model of predictive experienced well-being using the day reconstruction method (Kahneman et al., 2004a). Design/methodology/approach The authors applied the day reconstruction method to a sample of 1,823 episodes from 104 undergraduate students at a private university in Mexico to determine time assignment and emotional experience. Data were analyzed using a panel data regression model. Findings It is currently accepted that experienced well-being depends on how people assign their time; however, the results suggest marginal and interaction effects between time assignment and sharing activities with others. Individuals experience an increase in well-being when any activity is done with others, independent of the valence or the duration of the activity. Also, while money does not produce higher well-being, the share of the budget that is spent with others does cause people to experience more well-being. Finally, the results indicate that personal characteristics are equally important to experienced well-being. Research limitations/implications The sample was restricted to students; thus, to achieve external validity, it is necessary to replicate this analysis within different populations as well as groups of different ages and occupations. Originality/value The authors provided an integrative model of experienced well-being that combines personal characteristics, time assignment and contextual factors. In addition, this model provides a more accurate gauge of the impact of personal characteristics on well-being than previous studies by controlling for time assignment and by measuring the impact on experienced, rather than global, well-being.

What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?

“…It may also help to solve empirical puzzles that conventional economic theories find difficult to explain. A paradox needing explanation, for example, is that in several countries since World War II real income has drastically risen but self-reported subjective well-being 2 of the population has not increased or has even fallen slightly. In the United States between 1946 and 1991, per-capita real income rose by a factor of 2.5 (from approximately $11,000 to $27,000 in 1996 US$), but over the same period, happiness on average remained constant.…”

The key to happiness in collaborative workplaces. Evidence from coworking spaces

“…Over the last decade, the construct of happiness has come to the fore as a popular topic in several domains and streams of literature. This rising interest in happiness is the result of deep societal changes (Ayala et al 2017 ; Mogilner 2019 ), in which many people are striving to find new balance in several areas of their lives, including work (Stephan et al 2020 ). Indeed, within the more fluid and unstable society of the postmodern world, the proactive pursuit of happiness appears to be a top priority for people (Fitriana et al 2022 ) who tend to adopt more flexible existential pathways (Van Hugten et al 2021 ).…”

Voluntary simplicity: a content analysis of consumer comments

“…Besides, brands can organize collectivist events, workshops or cause-related marketing actions that engage consumers and encourage collaboration and group tasks such as green workshops. Such marketing events would improve experienced well-being and could be perceived as meaningful activities for simplifiers and contribute to the brand attachment (Ayala et al, 2017).…”