D. Marcus Elieser Bloch's... Oeconomische naturgeschichte der fische Deutschlands...

Bloch, Marcus Elieser; Berger, Daniel; Berger, F. G.; Bodenehr, G.; Darchow, C.; Gursch, C. F.; Hesse,; Krüger,; Rosenberg, F. C. W.; Schmidt, A. F.; Schmidt, F. G.; Schmidt, Friedrich W.; Schmidt, Johann Gottlieb; Schmidt, Ludwig

doi:10.5962/bhl.title.105191

Cited by 29 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gadus capelanus Lacépède (1800: 411) is based on 12 literature references, of which all except two (Bloch, 1783; Gmelin, 1789) are non‐binominal, and make references to local names Mollo at Venice and Poor and Power in Cornwall. It was synonymized with G. minutus L. 1758 by Risso (1810).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the references cited by Lacépède, a specimen is preserved only from Bloch (1783: fig. 1), viz .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Paepke, 1999), with locality Atlantic Ocean. It was identified by Bloch (1783) as G. minutus , and determined by Paepke (1999) as T. minutus . As explained above Linnaeus (1768) based his description of G. minutus entirely on literature data, including both Mediterranean Sea and North Atlantic Ocean populations and gave Mediterranean Sea as the locality.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Paepke, 1999), with locality Atlantic Ocean. It was identified by Bloch (1783) as G. minutus, and determined by Paepke (1999) as T. minutus. As explained above Linnaeus (1768)…”

Section: Ta X O N O M Y O F T R I S O P T E Ru S C a P E L A N U S 1255mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Taxonomic review of the genus Trisopterus(Teleostei: Gadidae) with recognition of the capelan Trisopterus capelanus as a valid species

Delling

Norén

Kullander

et al. 2011

Journal of Fish Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trisopterus is demonstrated to be monophyletic, including four distinct species: T. capelanus, T. esmarkii, T. luscus and T. minutus. The capelan T. capelanus is resurrected from the synonymy of poor cod T. minutus, and is shown to be morphologically more similar to T. luscus, to which species it is also more closely related, indicated by a phylogenetic analysis presented here. A lectotype is designated for T. luscus. Trisopterus fasciatus, the type species of Trisopterus, is a junior synonym of T. luscus, and the lectotype of T. luscus is designated as the neotype of T. fasciatus. The lectotype of T. luscus is also designated as the neotype of Gadus barbatus. Gadus barbatus has priority over T. luscus but the name is suppressed by prevailing usage of T. luscus. A neotype is designated also for T. minutus. A phylogenetic analysis using mitochondrial cytochrome b, and a fragment of the nuclear rhodopsin gene, shows that T. capelanus and T. luscus are sister species, and in turn sister to a clade formed by T. minutus and T. esmarkii.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the references cited by Lacépède, a specimen is preserved only from Bloch (1783: fig. 1), viz .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Paepke, 1999), with locality Atlantic Ocean. It was identified by Bloch (1783) as G. minutus, and determined by Paepke (1999) as T. minutus. As explained above Linnaeus (1768)…”

Section: Ta X O N O M Y O F T R I S O P T E Ru S C a P E L A N U S 1255mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Taxonomic review of the genus Trisopterus(Teleostei: Gadidae) with recognition of the capelan Trisopterus capelanus as a valid species

Delling

Norén

Kullander

et al. 2011

Journal of Fish Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The bitterling found in the east were described by Pallas (1776) as Cyprinus sericeus, whereas in the west it was described by Bloch (1782) as Cyprinus amarus. Both taxa were considered to be valid species until the beginning of the 19303, when Svetovidov & Eremeev (1935) made a comparison of two samples of bitterlings, one from the Dnieper River and the other from the River Amur.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geographical variation of some taxonomically important characters in fishes: the case of the bitterlingRhodeus sericeus

Holčík

Jedlička

1994

Environ Biol Fish

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SynopsisGeographical variation of three meristic characters, the number of pored scales in lateral line (LL), the number of branchial spines on the first gill arch (SPBR) and the number of transverse scale rows (SQU), were studied in the cyprinid fish Rhodeus sericeus and their validity for subspecific discrimination was tested. Counts investigated were taken from population samples at 23 localities covering an area of about 68" geographical longitude (2"40 W -49"30 E and 128"OO E -143'00 E), and about 15" geographical latitude (37"30 N -52"OO N). All three characters manifested a distinct clinal variation. LL, SQU and SPBR closely followed the species' essentially longitudinal distribution. The number of segments was also related to latitude, elevation, mean annual air temperature and fish size. Bergmann's rule was fully demonstrated for fishes and at the species level. Local regional differences were found within particular regions, indicating the existence of subclines. Variation of truly isolated populations seems to be predictable and dependent on the clines found in adjacent populations. None of the counts investigated, including a key character (number of pored scales in LL), can be used to distinguish amarus from sericeus. Owing to sufficient evidence that meristic and morphometric characters used to distinguish fish subspecies succumb to the clinal variation controlled by various factors, the concept of subspecies and trinomial nomenclature is inefficient, superfluous and misleading, and should be excluded from taxonomy, nomenclature and ecology.

show abstract

The Past, Present and Future Role of Limnology in Freshwater Fisheries Science

Arlinghaus

Johnson

Wolter

2008

International Review of Hydrobiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Limnology has greatly influenced the field of freshwater fisheries science, particularly fisheries biology. However, both fields became increasingly disconnected during the 20 th century, when major research traditions within limnology became more tightly focused and humans, even fish, were externalized. A paradigm shift occurring within freshwater fisheries science today is redefining research questions and approaches and is further challenging the role of limnology within fisheries science. Modern fisheries science has become a multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and sometimes transdisciplinary endeavour that melds the social with the natural sciences to understand fisheries as social-ecological systems. Limnology remains important to capture some of the dynamics inherent in social-ecological fisheries systems, but becomes one of the many necessary scientific disciplines of fisheries science, rather than the primary supporting science that it used to be. To improve scholarly communication between limnologists and freshwater fisheries scientists, major shifts in perspective are needed. It is hardly understandable why fish are only regarded as a component of the aquatic ecosystem or a means for biomanipulation in modern textbooks on limnology or limno-ecology, while the fisheries science as a natural component of theoretical and applied limnology in the spirit of THIENEMANN is not mentioned in the table of contents!H.-J. ELSTER, 1993 (translated from German) IntroductionLimnology as a scientific discipline studies the structure and function of inland waters. It has been called a subfield of ecology (LAMPERT and SOMMER, 1999) that includes "everything that affects fresh water" (NAUMANN and THIENEMANN, 1922). This encompasses biological, physical, chemical, geological and hydrological aspects. Limnological thinking, from its early days in the late 19 th century, has greatly influenced freshwater fisheries science, particularly freshwater fisheries biology (ELSTER, 1974(ELSTER, , 1993. Limnology itself has traditionally been viewed as a "synthetic science for which purely zoological or botanical * Corresponding author 542 R. ARLINGHAUS et al.

show abstract

D. Marcus Elieser Bloch's... Oeconomische naturgeschichte der fische Deutschlands...

Cited by 29 publications

References 0 publications

Taxonomic review of the genus Trisopterus(Teleostei: Gadidae) with recognition of the capelan Trisopterus capelanus as a valid species

Taxonomic review of the genus Trisopterus(Teleostei: Gadidae) with recognition of the capelan Trisopterus capelanus as a valid species

Geographical variation of some taxonomically important characters in fishes: the case of the bitterlingRhodeus sericeus

The Past, Present and Future Role of Limnology in Freshwater Fisheries Science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About