1975
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0440501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoplasmic Oestradiol-Binding Sites and Their Relationship to Oestradiol Content in the Endometrium of Cattle

Abstract: Summary. Twenty-three cows and heifers were killed at known times during the oestrous cycle or during the first 35 days of pregnancy. Duplicate cytosol preparations were made from the endometrium of each uterine horn and both the binding-site concentration and the oestradiol level were determined for each sample. During the cycle, the oestradiol concentration was only 0\m=.\2to 1\m=

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a conceptus suppressed both oestro¬ gen receptor mRNA and protein in the endome¬ trium. In cyclic sheep (Koligian & Stormshak, 1977;Miller et al 1911b;Findlay et al 1982;Cherny et al 1991) and cattle (Kimball & Hansel, 1974;Senior, 1975;Zelinski et al 1980;Meyer et al 1988), oestro¬ gen receptor levels are greatest during oestrus and decline under the influence of chronically elevated progesterone during dioestrus. For endometrial oestrogen receptors, the relative amounts of mRNA and protein were approximately five-and eightfold lower respectively in pregnant compared with cyclic ewes on day 16 post-oestrus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of a conceptus suppressed both oestro¬ gen receptor mRNA and protein in the endome¬ trium. In cyclic sheep (Koligian & Stormshak, 1977;Miller et al 1911b;Findlay et al 1982;Cherny et al 1991) and cattle (Kimball & Hansel, 1974;Senior, 1975;Zelinski et al 1980;Meyer et al 1988), oestro¬ gen receptor levels are greatest during oestrus and decline under the influence of chronically elevated progesterone during dioestrus. For endometrial oestrogen receptors, the relative amounts of mRNA and protein were approximately five-and eightfold lower respectively in pregnant compared with cyclic ewes on day 16 post-oestrus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyclic variations in endometrial steroid receptor concentrations have been described in cattle (Senior, 1975;Zelinski et al 1982;Meyer et al 1988), sheep (Koligian & Stormshak, 1977;Miller et al 1911b;Findlay et al 1982;Cherny et al 1991) and pigs (Deaver & Guthrie, 1980). Particularly well-charac¬ terized is the phenomenon of oestrogen-induced synthesis of both oestrogen and progesterone recep¬ tors (Aronica & Katzenellenbogen, 1991), with con¬ centrations of both receptors being greatest around oestrus in ewes (Koligian & Stormshak, 1977;Miller et al 1911b;Cherny et al 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these events, however, was observed when plasma progesterone concentrations were high in any of the heifers studied. The inhibition by progesterone of oestradiol-17ß-induced changes in the cervix and in oestrous behaviour may have been due to progester¬ one reducing the concentration of oestradiol-17ß receptors in tissue of the reproductive tract (Senior, 1975;Henricks & Harris, 1978) and brain (Feder & Marrone, 1977) respectively. The blockade of ovula¬ tion by progesterone was presumably caused by sup¬ pression of the obligatory oestradiol-17ß-induced preovulatory LH surge (Kesner, Padmanabhan & Convey, 1982;Schoenemann, Humphrey, Crowder et al 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies performed around the end of 1970s and during the 1980s involving steroid binding assays and recent studies using immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry, it was reported that the ER and PR concentrations in bovine endometrium vary considerably during the oestrous cycle and they were found to be highest at oestrus or a few days later and to drop to lower values along luteal phase (Senior 1975; Henricks and Harris 1978; Zelinski et al. 1982; Meyer et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%