1968
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1968.tb09104.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cystic Corpora Lutea and Normal and Cystic Graafian Follicles in the Cow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
18
1
5

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…That notion is supported by the fact that cuboidal scarcely ciliated and single layered epithelium coexisted with stratified squamous keratinizing epithelium in some of these previously described lesions (Costa, 1974;Edwards, 2002). As early as in the 1960's, Donaldson and Hansel (1968) have mentioned squamous metaplasia of the rete ovarii in a study which aimed to evaluate cystic corpora lutea and follicular cysts in bovine ovaries, but in spite of mentioning it they did not describe or document the lesion (Donaldson and Hansel, 1968). Considering its clinical presentation and its tendency to generate cystic lesions in the ovary, degenerative cystic conditions of the ovary as well as ovarian cystic neoplasms should be included in the differential diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…That notion is supported by the fact that cuboidal scarcely ciliated and single layered epithelium coexisted with stratified squamous keratinizing epithelium in some of these previously described lesions (Costa, 1974;Edwards, 2002). As early as in the 1960's, Donaldson and Hansel (1968) have mentioned squamous metaplasia of the rete ovarii in a study which aimed to evaluate cystic corpora lutea and follicular cysts in bovine ovaries, but in spite of mentioning it they did not describe or document the lesion (Donaldson and Hansel, 1968). Considering its clinical presentation and its tendency to generate cystic lesions in the ovary, degenerative cystic conditions of the ovary as well as ovarian cystic neoplasms should be included in the differential diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Hasler et al [13] reported that the pregnancy rate in cows with cystic CL was comparable to that in cows with favorably developing CL in surgical transfer of fresh embryos. Some reports have also shown the blood P concentration in cows with cystic CL to be lower than that in cows with normal luteinization [28,29], while others have shown the blood P concentration in cows with cystic CL to be the same as that in cows with normal luteinization [30,31]. Taking these observations into consideration, P-secreting function is considered to depend on the quantity of luteal tissue, and cystic CL does not impair pregnancy if the quantity of luteal tissue is good enough and the Psecreting function is normal, while the pregnancy rate is impaired if the quantity of luteal tissue is small and P secretion is subnormal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajakoski (1960) described a model of "follicular waves" during the bovine oestrus cycle, reporting differences in the development of a follicular population between one phase of growth, followed by a static phase, and subsequent follicular atresia. Other authors have argued that follicular growth is constant and independent of the cycle (Donaldson and Hansel, 1968;Dufour et al, 1972;Spicer and Echternkamp, 1986).It is now well known that the most frequent patterns of follicular development in cows are the 2 follicular wave pa�ern (Rajakoski, 1960;Mariana and Nguyen, 1973;Pierson and Ginther, 1988;Ginther et al, 1989b;Knopf et al, 1989;Stock and Fortune, 1993; Carriere et al, 1995) and the 3 follicular wave pa�ern (Ireland and Roche, 1983;Stock and Fortune, 1993; Carriere et al, 1995;Taya et al, 1996). Cycles with one or four follicular waves have been reported less frequently Savio et al,1988; Carriere et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajakoski (1960) described a model of "follicular waves" during the bovine oestrus cycle, reporting differences in the development of a follicular population between one phase of growth, followed by a static phase, and subsequent follicular atresia. Other authors have argued that follicular growth is constant and independent of the cycle (Donaldson and Hansel, 1968;Dufour et al, 1972;Spicer and Echternkamp, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%