2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutaneous evaporative thermolysis and hair coat surface temperature of calves evaluated with the aid of a gas analyzer and infrared thermography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De Souza et al ( 119 ) studied 23 Zebu × Holstein crossbred calves to evaluate whether cutaneous evaporative thermolysis occurs heterogeneously on the body surface of ruminants. Using IRT, they assessed the animals' limbs, neck, thorax, abdomen, and back under ambient temperatures <25°C, 25–29°C, and >29°C.…”
Section: Use Of Infrared Thermography In Assessing Hypothermia In New...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Souza et al ( 119 ) studied 23 Zebu × Holstein crossbred calves to evaluate whether cutaneous evaporative thermolysis occurs heterogeneously on the body surface of ruminants. Using IRT, they assessed the animals' limbs, neck, thorax, abdomen, and back under ambient temperatures <25°C, 25–29°C, and >29°C.…”
Section: Use Of Infrared Thermography In Assessing Hypothermia In New...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general terms, indications are similar for use of IRT in humans and animals, i.e., as a diagnostic aid, to enhance clinical assessment and to assess thermal, functional and musculoskeletal stress in animals. While this review focusses on disease detection in livestock, there has also been extensive research undertaken on evaluating IRT to detect heat stress in animals ( 126 , 171 , 172 ) and to assess the reproductive health of sires ( 173 , 174 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random deviation was larger (42%), but that could not only be accounted for by errors in the ventilated skin box method. The rather good overall agreement is an interesting result because there are several error sources when applying the ventilated skin box to measure cutaneous evaporative water loss as mentioned before: 1) the sweating rate varies between different locations (de Souza et al, 2018); 2) there are cyclic sweat secretion patterns, causing variations in time (Gebremedhin et al, 2010); and 3) the air flow rate through the ventilated box is different from the air flow surrounding the cow trunk (McLean, 1963). The results from 4…”
Section: Comparison Of Cutaneous Evaporative Water Loss Rate Measured...mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This information also gives insight into the effect of different cooling systems on additional heat losses. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to determine the total evaporative water loss rate from dairy cows at daily level, which can avoid some sources of errors associated with different sweating rates between different skin regions, and cyclic sweating patterns (Berman, 1957, Gebremedhin et al, 2008, Liang et al, 2009b, de Souza et al, 2018. With the design of the current experiment, we were able to estimate the total evaporative water loss from cows, as well as separate it between skin evaporation and respiratory evaporation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation