Customer response to interactional service experience

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to examine causal attribution in interactional service experiences. The paper investigates how triggers in the environment of a customer-employee interaction influence customer behavioral response to employees' negative and positive affect. Additionally, it studies the role of sympathy and authenticity as underlying mechanisms of this relationship. Design/methodology/approach-Two scenario-based experimental designs (N1 ¼ 162; N2 ¼ 138) were used. Videotaped scenarios served as stimulus material for the manipulation of two focal variables: the employee's emotional display as either negative or positive and the availability of an emotion trigger in the interaction environment to convey the attribution dimension of cause uncontrollability. The emotion trigger's visibility was varied in the two studies. Customer response was captured by buying intentions. Findings-Customer responses are more favorable for both positive and negative interactional experiences when customers have access to information on cause uncontrollability (i.e. notice triggers in the interaction environment). Analyses reveal that these effects stem from feelings of sympathy for negative experiences and authenticity for positive experiences. Originality/value-This research supports the relevance of causal attribution research on interactional service experiences, which have high-profit impact. Moreover, the findings underline the importance of the experience of fact in service interactions and thereby provide a more nuanced view on the discussion of whether service providers should use impression management strategies to engender customer satisfaction even when this behavior is "faked."

Robots or frontline employees? Exploring customers’ attributions of responsibility and stability after service failure or success

“…Moreover, customers typically underestimate the potential impact of environmental factors that have caused an employee's Robots or frontline employees? performance and assume that an employee could have easily behaved differently than he/she did in the last service encounter (Albrecht et al, 2016;Choi and Mattila, 2008).…”

Evaluation of key factors for service experience: A comparison of tourism factories and international tourism hotels

“…In a marketplace where service industries are fiercely competitive, service providers cannot use a single service to satisfy customers’ constantly changing demands (Albrecht et al, 2016). Customer expectations in relation to service are that service providers integrate resources and deliver a series of services able to meet the customer’s requirements and help the customers establish a positive frame of mind; this series of services constitutes a service experience (Hellén and Gummerus, 2013; Verhoef et al, 2009).…”

The effect of stress on customer perception of the frontline employee: an experimental study

“…The existing relationship between arousal and liking in a personal context begs the question of whether it can also be found in a professional context, for example, increased interpersonal liking (IPL) between customer and contact employee. In industries with intense contact between employees and customers, especially service industries, personal sympathy and IPL play a vital role and can reinforce outcomes such as trust in a customer context (Albrecht et al 2016;Darden et al 1991;Nicholson et al 2001).…”