2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12471-017-0992-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current MitraClip experience, safety and feasibility in the Netherlands

Abstract: PurposeData on MitraClip procedural safety and efficacy in the Netherlands are scarce. We aim to provide an overview of the Dutch MitraClip experience.MethodsWe pooled anonymised demographic and procedural data of 1151 consecutive MitraClip patients, from 13 Dutch hospitals. Data was collected by product specialists in collaboration with local operators. Effect on mitral regurgitation was intra-procedurally assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography. Technical success and device success were defined accordi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the recently introduced larger MitraClip XTR device, improved intraprocedural coaptation in severe FMR cases should be obtainable. Another aspect potentially limiting the applicability of our study results to current TMVR therapy is the use of 1.1 clips compared with a mean of 1.5 or 1.7 clips per procedure reported by others, 28,39 thus reflecting a learning curve in the field of TMVR therapy (i.e., larger numbers of implanted clips and less restrictive selection of patients according to the EVEREST criteria).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…With the recently introduced larger MitraClip XTR device, improved intraprocedural coaptation in severe FMR cases should be obtainable. Another aspect potentially limiting the applicability of our study results to current TMVR therapy is the use of 1.1 clips compared with a mean of 1.5 or 1.7 clips per procedure reported by others, 28,39 thus reflecting a learning curve in the field of TMVR therapy (i.e., larger numbers of implanted clips and less restrictive selection of patients according to the EVEREST criteria).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The reason for this discrepancy is most likely the increasing experience and practice with the MitraClip system since its introduction, leading to more targeted deployment of fluoroscopy and reduced fluoroscopy time. Likewise, a registry study reported that device time substantially decreased since the emergence of percutaneous mitral valve repair 13 . Thus, although derived from a single‐center study, our findings might best represent the actual radiation exposure in contemporary use of MitraClip implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After introduction of the low dose protocol, radiation dose area product dropped from 2265 to 693 [366-1231] cGy•cm 2 (p < 0.001, Table 2 and Figure 3). Concurrently, fluoroscopy time decreased from 25 to 17 [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] min (p = 0.02). Dose area product per fluoroscopy time also strongly decreased from 110 [80-140] to 38 cGy•cm 2 /min (p < 0.001), reflecting the adjustments in X-ray settings.…”
Section: Radiation Exposure and Procedural Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the first-in-man experience with the PASCAL MV repair system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) has recently been reported and showed a consistent reduction in MR severity following percutaneous E-to-E repair [ 9 ]. Moreover, recent clinical data suggests that transcatheter E-to-E repair is an effective strategy for treating MR and is well tolerated in select high risk patients [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%