2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.09165
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current-induced torque originating from orbital current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the negligible SOC of Cu*, a conventional SHE-induced SMR cannot lead to the novel MR in the 𝛽𝛽 scan. Also, the spin REE is believed not to be the origin of SOT in Py / Cu* heterostructures [26], and thus the Rashba-Edelstein MR cannot explain the result. From the above considerations, we argue that the OREMR is the most plausible mechanism for the observed MR in the 𝛽𝛽 scan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the negligible SOC of Cu*, a conventional SHE-induced SMR cannot lead to the novel MR in the 𝛽𝛽 scan. Also, the spin REE is believed not to be the origin of SOT in Py / Cu* heterostructures [26], and thus the Rashba-Edelstein MR cannot explain the result. From the above considerations, we argue that the OREMR is the most plausible mechanism for the observed MR in the 𝛽𝛽 scan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, the work of Ref. [26] indicates the emergence of the orbital current and orbital torque. The signs for the effective SOT are opposite in Py / Cu / CuOx and Fe / Cu / CuOx, which cannot be explained by the conventional spin current scenario.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The orbital current is similar to the spin current in many ways because both orbital angular momentum (OAM) and spin transform in the same way under symmetry operations. Thus, experiments so far have focused on light element systems where the spin current contribution is expected to be negligible [29][30][31][32][33][34], or systems where the orbital and spin currents compete with each other and are opposite in sign [33,35,36]. Although these experiments imply the presence of the orbital current, which can hardly be explained by the spin current picture, they are far from being "direct" confirmations of the orbital current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] strongly supports that an interfacial mechanism is responsible for the SOT when the oxidized Cu is electrically insulating. One of the proposed mechanisms suggests a crucial role of the ORE in surface oxidized Cu, by which "orbital current" is generated and injected into the adjacent ferromagnet [27][28][29]. However, another mechanism based on spin-vorticity coupling has also been proposed [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%