Cumplimiento de los requisitos impuestos por los países importadores: principios y prácticas para garantizar la inocuidad de los alimentos desde la propia explotación

Pj, Dagg; Rj, Butler; Jg, Murray; Rr, Biddle

doi:10.20506/rst.25.2.1692

Cited by 12 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The components of a traceability system should include the following: biosecurity, disease monitoring, and reporting, feedstuff safety, the safe use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals, the control of potential food-borne pathogens, and traceability [ 87 , 88 ]. These can be controlled from the farm by keeping records including animal health records, breeding, and animal feeds [ 89 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Information Communication Technology Can Enhance Evidence-Based Decisions and Farm-to-Fork Animal Traceability for Livestock Farmers

Mwanga

Mbega

Yonah

et al. 2020

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to changes in the livestock sector and the rise of consumer demand for comprehensive and integrated food security and safety, there has been a concern on the use of farm data in enhancing animal traceability and decision-making by farmers and other decision-makers in the livestock sector. To ensure high production through effective decision-making and auditable standards, producers are required to have better traceability and record systems. Therefore, this study aimed at (1) reviewing the current recording/data management and animal traceability systems used by small-scale farmers in developing countries and (2) analyzing how data management systems should be designed to enhance efficient decision-making and animal traceability from farm to fork. This study found that, still, a majority of small-scale farmers do not keep records leading to poor decision-making on the farm and policymaking. We also found that those who keep records do not store their data in electronic format, which again poses another challenge in data analysis. Moreover, this study found that the majority of traceability tools used by farmers in developing countries do not meet international standards based on tools they use for tracing animals; farmers were reported to use tools like branding and ear tagging, which provide very little information about the animal. Such tools lack the capability to keep track of useful information about an animal, e.g., information about feeding and animal health. In conclusion, this study recommended a better electronic system to be used at the farm level to facilitate data analysis, hence promoting informed decision-making and adherence to the international animal traceability standards. Otherwise, there is a need for researchers to conduct more studies in developing different analytical models for exploring on-farm data in order to improve the decision-making process by farmers and other stakeholders.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Information Communication Technology Can Enhance Evidence-Based Decisions and Farm-to-Fork Animal Traceability for Livestock Farmers

Mwanga

Mbega

Yonah

et al. 2020

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Normative and pre-normative aspects for the management of actual and perspective POPs in meat and meat products

Brambilla¹,

Iamiceli²,

Ferri³

et al. 2008

Meat Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring of pesticides and veterinary drugs in Australian cattle: verification of the residue control system

Lutze¹,

Derrick²,

Korth³

et al. 2009

Food Additives and Contaminants: Part B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Australian National Residue Survey in partnership with the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service and industry routinely monitors beef to ensure that regulatory requirements for residues are being met. In the 10-year period from 1997 to 2006 a total of 128,902 samples were subjected to residue testing covering veterinary drugs and veterinary and agricultural pesticides in a random monitoring program. Residues of agricultural and veterinary chemicals exceeded the Australian standard in 13 and 7 samples, respectively. Greater than 99% of samples did not contain detectable residues above the Australian standard while greater than 90% of samples did not contain any residues of compounds included in the survey. The results of the surveys provide verification that the Australian residue control system is appropriate and that the requirements of countries importing Australian meat products can be satisfied. The surveys have also demonstrated that industry based programs and state based regulatory controls over sites contaminated with organochlorine residues are effective in managing residues of these chemicals in cattle.

show abstract

Cumplimiento de los requisitos impuestos por los países importadores: principios y prácticas para garantizar la inocuidad de los alimentos desde la propia explotación

Cited by 12 publications

References 4 publications

How Information Communication Technology Can Enhance Evidence-Based Decisions and Farm-to-Fork Animal Traceability for Livestock Farmers

How Information Communication Technology Can Enhance Evidence-Based Decisions and Farm-to-Fork Animal Traceability for Livestock Farmers

Normative and pre-normative aspects for the management of actual and perspective POPs in meat and meat products

Monitoring of pesticides and veterinary drugs in Australian cattle: verification of the residue control system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About