The presence and metabolism of endogenous steroid hormones in meat-producing animals has been the subject of much research over the past 40 years. While significant data are available, no comprehensive review has yet been performed. Species considered in this review are bovine, porcine, ovine, equine, caprine and cervine, while steroid hormones include the androgenic-anabolic steroids testosterone, nandrolone and boldenone, as well as their precursors and metabolites. Information on endogenous steroid hormone concentrations is primarily useful in two ways: (1) in relation to pathological versus 'normal' physiology and (2) in relation to the detection of the illegal abuse of these hormones in residue surveillance programmes. Since the major focus of this review is on the detection of steroids abuse in animal production, the information gathered to date is used to guide future research. A major deficiency in much of the existing published literature is the lack of standardization and formal validation of experimental approach. Key articles are cited that highlight the huge variation in reported steroid concentrations that can result when samples are analysed by different laboratories under different conditions. These deficiencies are in most cases so fundamental that it is difficult to make reliable comparisons between data sets and hence it is currently impossible to recommend definitive detection strategies. Standardization of the experimental approach would need to involve common experimental protocols and collaboratively validated analytical methods. In particular, standardization would need to cover everything from the demographic of the animal population studied, the method of sample collection and storage (especially the need to sample live versus slaughter sampling since the two methods of surveillance have very different requirements, particularly temporally), sample preparation technique (including mode of extraction, hydrolysis and derivatization), the end-point analytical detection technique, validation protocols, and the statistical methods applied to the resulting data. Although efforts are already underway (at HFL and LABERCA) to produce more definitive data and promote communication among the scientific community on this issue, the convening of a formal European Union working party is recommended.
Proficiency test results from 5 countries involving 61 separate interlaboratory proficiency tests for pesticide residues were examined in this study. A total of 24 different matrixes and 869 relative standard deviations of the mean (or median) pesticide residue concentration were statistically evaluated in relation to the Horwitz function. The aim was to determine whether or not the concentration-dependent relationship described by Horwitz would hold for the much narrower range of chemicals and concentrations covered in routine pesticide residue analysis. Although for fatty (animal-derived) matrixes the variability increased as the concentration decreased in line with the Horwitz equation, the between-laboratories relative standard deviations for nonfatty matrixes (fruit, vegetables, and grain) remained at 25% over the entire concentration range of 1 μg/kg to 10 mg/kg for the pesticides studied. Given these findings, the Horwitz equation remains valid for calculating uncertainties involving pesticide residues in fatty matrixes. However, for pesticide residue analyses involving nonfatty matrixes, a constant relative standard deviation of 25% is more appropriate for calculating uncertainties, particularly when a reported result is assessed against a regulatory limit.
The Australian National Residue Survey in partnership with the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service and industry routinely monitors beef to ensure that regulatory requirements for residues are being met. In the 10-year period from 1997 to 2006 a total of 128,902 samples were subjected to residue testing covering veterinary drugs and veterinary and agricultural pesticides in a random monitoring program. Residues of agricultural and veterinary chemicals exceeded the Australian standard in 13 and 7 samples, respectively. Greater than 99% of samples did not contain detectable residues above the Australian standard while greater than 90% of samples did not contain any residues of compounds included in the survey. The results of the surveys provide verification that the Australian residue control system is appropriate and that the requirements of countries importing Australian meat products can be satisfied. The surveys have also demonstrated that industry based programs and state based regulatory controls over sites contaminated with organochlorine residues are effective in managing residues of these chemicals in cattle.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.