2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culturing substrates influence the morphological, mechanical and biochemical features of lung adenocarcinoma cells cultured in 2D or 3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 To confirm these findings, we performed life-cell AFM measurements in a region of the cell where the KFs are suspended between the flat cell periphery and the elevated nuclear region to avoid a potential restraint of the AFM probe by the underlying substrate. The E-moduli in our measurements were well within the range of previous studies 54 anddespite considerable differences between cells with the same mimicked phosphorylation site-both mutants mimicking phosphorylation of K18-S34 (K18-YFP-S34E and K18-YFP-S34D) reduced the mean elastic moduli in the respective cells ( Figure 6B). Interestingly, Sivaramakrishnan et al 9 observed in their experiments an increase in cell stiffness after 1 hour of mechanical stress, however, this study used primary cells, assessed the storage modulus and shear stress instead of cell stretch was applied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…12 To confirm these findings, we performed life-cell AFM measurements in a region of the cell where the KFs are suspended between the flat cell periphery and the elevated nuclear region to avoid a potential restraint of the AFM probe by the underlying substrate. The E-moduli in our measurements were well within the range of previous studies 54 anddespite considerable differences between cells with the same mimicked phosphorylation site-both mutants mimicking phosphorylation of K18-S34 (K18-YFP-S34E and K18-YFP-S34D) reduced the mean elastic moduli in the respective cells ( Figure 6B). Interestingly, Sivaramakrishnan et al 9 observed in their experiments an increase in cell stiffness after 1 hour of mechanical stress, however, this study used primary cells, assessed the storage modulus and shear stress instead of cell stretch was applied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the latter, the contact surface between the membrane and the surface is very large, while in a scaffold, the cell membrane interacts with the ECM-mimicking scaffold at discrete locations [94]. This difference results in a stretched morphology with a well-defined cytoskeleton for cells grown on 2D substrates, whereas, in 3D scaffolds, the cytoskeleton typically re-organizes [95][96][97]. Note that, despite its difference with 2D culture systems, the morphology of cells embedded in a 3D scaffold resembles more the in vivo physiology [98,99].…”
Section: Scaffold-embedded Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 69 ] Recent research has indicated that, compared with a 2D environment where some loss of functionality in post‐differentiation happens as a result of induced abnormal phenotypae, a 3D environment mimicks native tissues and stimulate and sustain the functionality of cells. [ 70 ]…”
Section: D Printed Graphene Structures For Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%