Cultural Mapping of the Heritage Districts in Medan, North Sumatra

Fitri, Isnen; Ratna, Ratna; Sitorus, Rudolf; Affan, Muhammad

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/180/1/012088

Cited by 8 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interviews are an effective method whereby experts engage with locals when co-mapping cultural heritage, such as the nature and location of intangible heritage (Fitri, Ratna, & Affan, 2017;Musa & Feng, 2016). Ferretti and Gandino (2018) employ both interviews and questionnaires with residents in discussing local issues and finalising To provide the community with relevant and objective information to assist them in understanding the management project, approaches and intended outcomes.…”

Section: Active Participatory Methods: Awareness-raising and Capacity-buildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Workshops not only work as a sensitisation activity to enhance local cultural identities and sustain traditional art (Kyriakidis & Anagnostopoulos, 2015;Bruku, 2015;Inniss, 2012) but also as training to educate communities about conservation knowledge and technologies (Ferreira, 2018;Husnéin, 2017). Interestingly, digital technologies including GIS, RS, GPS and social media have been included in workshop programmes in recent years (Achille et al, 2017;Fitri et al, 2017;Tipnis & Chandrashekhar, 2017). Residents are trained as local professionals to work with experts so that governments can share and improve digital heritage databases (Achille et al, 2017;Tipnis & Chandrashekhar, 2017;Wilson & Desha, 2016).…”

Section: Active Participatory Methods: Awareness-raising and Capacity-buildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Krishnamurthy

Roders

et al. 2020

Cities

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community participation is an essential issue in heritage management. The international heritage organisation ICCROM published a guidance document discussing people-centred approaches to heritage management in 2015. Cultural heritage management is recommended to be carried out through a community participation process. Despite the growing literature on community participation in cultural heritage management, little research has been done on comparing Chinese to international approaches. Although in China several pilot projects have conducted effective community participation and achieved excellent outcomes. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing an overview that compares and discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and international approaches. A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art was conducted to explore these differences based on four themes: engaged communities, participatory methods, degrees of participation and steps taken within cultural heritage management. This review concludes both Chinese and international practices seek to collaborate with and empower local communities in their approaches, with Chinese pilot cases, such as Tianzifang in Shanghai. However, in general, Chinese cultural heritage management is government-led, in which community participation is happening to a minimal degree. China is encouraged to learn from international practices when developing contextualised management approaches, to better face the challenges of rapid urbanisation.

show abstract

Section: Active Participatory Methods: Awareness-raising and Capacity-buildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Active Participatory Methods: Awareness-raising and Capacity-buildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Krishnamurthy

Roders

et al. 2020

Cities

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More recently, it has become an increasingly important tool in the built environment field due to its ability to map the distinctive characteristics and local cultural assets of a place. This is evidenced by the increased number of studies using the method in the built environment field that have been published (Abd Rashid, 2015;Assumma & Ventura, 2014;Avrami, Macdonald, Mason & Myers, 2019;Fitri, Ratna, Sitorus, & Affan, 2017;Moore & Borrup, 2017).…”

Section: Cultural Mappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…UNESCO Bangkok (2017) recognizes cultural mapping as an indispensable tool in preserving tangible and intangible world cultural heritage. While mapping of intangible heritage has been much studied by scholars (Crawhall, 2009;Fitri et al, 2017), the importance of tangible or physical features in describing places is undeniable. Peng, Strijker & Wu (2020), for example, argue that the uniqueness of a place is attributed and perceived by people based on physical settings.…”

Section: Cultural Mappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying Place Distinctiveness Through Cultural Resource Mapping

Azmi

Ahmad

Ali

2021

jrcp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regardless of their size, every town, city, or more generally each place, has its own beautiful, unique and distinct characteristics. However, only few studies have provided valuable information on exceptional and unique features that can contribute to the distinctiveness and identity of small-scale towns. It is important to identify these cultural resources, especially now that the identity of small towns is rapidly weakening. This study explored the significance of cultural resource mapping as an important technique for identifying the unique characteristics of a place. A questionnaire survey was conducted amongst a random sample of 119 local community members in Sungai Lembing, a small town in the state of Pahang, Malaysia, to investigate respondents’ mental representations of familiar features that they experience in the town, through cultural mapping. It was revealed that natural features, buildings, and non-building structures were seen by the respondents as the most dominant elements that constitute the individuality of their town. While deepening the community’s understanding and awareness of their cultural assets, this paper also highlights the significance of cultural mapping as a tool for identifying unique characteristics of a place, especially those that may have been previously overlooked. Abstrak. Terlepas dari ukurannya, setiap kota atau lebih umum lagi suatu tempat, memiliki keindahan, keunikan dan karakter tersendiri. Namun, hanya sedikit penelitian yang memberikan informasi berharga tentang fitur luar biasa dan unik yang dapat berkontribusi pada kekhasan dan identitas kota skala kecil. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk mengidentifikasi sumber daya budaya tersebut terutama dalam kondisi saat ini di mana identitas kota kecil dengan cepat melemah. Makalah ini mencoba mengeksplorasi pentingnya pemetaan sumber daya budaya sebagai teknik penting untuk mengidentifikasi karakteristik unik suatu tempat. Survei kuesioner dilakukan di antara sampel acak dari 119 komunitas lokal di Sungai Lembing, sebuah kota kecil di negara bagian Pahang, Malaysia; untuk menyelidiki representasi mental responden dari fitur-fitur yang sudah dikenal yang dialami di kota melalui pemetaan budaya. Studi ini mengungkapkan bahwa fitur alam, bangunan dan struktur non-bangunan digambar oleh responden sebagai elemen dominan yang membentuk individualitas kota. Sambil memperdalam pemahaman dan kesadaran masyarakat akan aset budaya mereka, makalah ini juga menyoroti pentingnya pemetaan budaya sebagai salah satu alat penting dalam mengidentifikasi karakteristik unik suatu tempat terutama yang mungkin sebelumnya diabaikan. Kata kunci. pemetaan budaya, dokumentasi, identitas, tempat, kota kecil.

show abstract

“…Another study is in the form of making 3D animations of several historical buildings in Medan City (Syahputra, 2020). Another research focuses on the mapping of colonial period buildings in Medan City (Fitri, 2020). Finally, a specific study explores the potential for tourism development of historical buildings in Medan City (Surbakti, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nurturing the Collective Memory of Plantation Traces

Damanik

2020

Hist Stud J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article aims to explore and to discuss strategies for nurturing collective memory and identity in Medan City. The problem is focused on strategies to care for the collective memory and identity of the city while preserving cultural heritage buildings in Medan City. The theoretical references used are the collective memory and city identity approaches of Kusno. The study found that the collective memory and identity of the plantation are attached to the grandeur of the shape and variety of building architecture. The variety of architecture refers to masterpieces of internationally renowned architects, while the forms and patterns represent the climate, aesthetics, and success of the plantation. Novelty studies that the lack of protection of cultural heritage buildings has implications for the waning of collective memory and city identity. Economic and business battles, lack of government political will, and synergy with the private sector have an impact on the destruction of cultural heritage buildings. Cultural heritage buildings are an integral part of the history of Medan City with plantations. The study concluded that maintaining collective memory and plantation identity is a preservation activity of cultural heritage buildings. The strategy of nurturing for cultural heritage buildings is not enough through local regulations, utilization as public spaces, but also providing incentives for cultural heritage building owners. Artikel bertujuan mengeksplorasi dan mendiskusikan strategi merawat memori kolektif dan identitas perkebunan di Kota Medan. Permasalahan difokuskan pada strategi merawat memori kolektif dan identitas kota sekaligus melestarikan bangunan pusaka budaya di Kota Medan. Acuan teoritis dipergunakan adalah pendekatan memori kolektif dan identitas kota dari Kusno. Kajian menemukan bahwa memori kolektif dan identitas perkebunan terlampir pada kemegahan bentuk dan ragam arsitektur bangunan. Ragam arsitektur menunjuk pada mahakarya arsitek kenamaan mancanegara; sedang bentuk dan pola merepresentasi iklim, estetika dan keberhasilan perkebunan. Novelty kajian bahwa kurangnya perlindungan bangunan pusaka budaya berimplikasi bagi memudarnya memori kolektif dan identitas kota. Pertarungan ekonomi dan bisnis, kurangnya political-will pemerintah serta sinergi dengan swasta berdampak bagi pemusnahan bangunan pusaka budaya. Bangunan pusaka budaya merupakan bagian integral sejarah Kota Medan dengan perkebunan. Kajian menyimpulkan bahwa memelihara memori kolektif dan identitas perkebunan adalah aktifitas pelestarian bangunan pusaka budaya. Strategi merawat bangunan pusaka budaya tidak cukup melalui Peraturan Daerah, pemamfaatan sebagai ruang publik, tetapi juga pemberian insentif bagi pemilik bangunan pusaka budaya.

show abstract

Cultural Mapping of the Heritage Districts in Medan, North Sumatra

Cited by 8 publications

References 2 publications

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Identifying Place Distinctiveness Through Cultural Resource Mapping

Nurturing the Collective Memory of Plantation Traces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About