Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Abstract

Community participation is an essential issue in heritage management. The international heritage organisation ICCROM published a guidance document discussing people-centred approaches to heritage management in 2015. Cultural heritage management is recommended to be carried out through a community participation process. Despite the growing literature on community participation in cultural heritage management, little research has been done on comparing Chinese to international approaches. Although in China several pilot projects have conducted effective community participation and achieved excellent outcomes. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing an overview that compares and discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and international approaches. A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art was conducted to explore these differences based on four themes: engaged communities, participatory methods, degrees of participation and steps taken within cultural heritage management. This review concludes both Chinese and international practices seek to collaborate with and empower local communities in their approaches, with Chinese pilot cases, such as Tianzifang in Shanghai. However, in general, Chinese cultural heritage management is government-led, in which community participation is happening to a minimal degree. China is encouraged to learn from international practices when developing contextualised management approaches, to better face the challenges of rapid urbanisation.

Identifying Challenges and Solutions in Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse through the Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Amsterdam

“…Similarly, the different thematic emphasis revealed by this research could be explained by the change in discourse in domains such as heritage and sustainable urban development [90,94]. For example, factors referring to civic engagement present increased discussion and articulation probably due to the rising interest in participatory practices in heritage management [95]. Additionally, a growing interest in the practicing of adaptive reuse might have triggered measures and spread coping strategies that made both design and technical aspects and legal requirements less regarded as challenges.…”

Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities

“…In that sense, the smart city concept often promotes community participation in decision making and the development of a participatory approach as support to urban governance [75]. Current architectural heritage management practice shows the importance of community involvement and shifts from a centralized governing process to a more holistic approach that meets the preferences of the residents [76,77]. The architectural indicators include the possibilities for the protection and restoration of existing architectural heritage facilities.…”

Recognition of Values of Traditional Villages in Southwest China for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Liufang Village

“…Villagers have a strong demand for local resources to develop tourism, but they hope someone can plan and design it in depth. Although Liufang village has not been developed for tourism, these demands of residents are in line with the bottomup community participation of traditional village's tourism development [40]. Liufang village is very suitable for such a tourism development model.…”

“…Liufang village is very suitable for such a tourism development model. It is suggested that the development of tourism should be carried out gradually from tourism training measures, community tourism organization, participation rules and regulations, etc., especially with respect to economic policy, it is suggested a set of community participation bonus system be established that derives from community autonomy participation in tourism from bottom to top [40,41].…”