Cultural Heritage Sites Visualization System based on Outdoor Augmented Reality

Han, Jong-Gil; Park, Kyoung-Wook; Ban, Kyeong-Jin; Kim, Eung-Kon

doi:10.1016/j.aasri.2013.10.011

Cited by 39 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although MAR applications were first designed and tested in indoor environments, the advantage of portability provided by mobile devices facilitated their expansion to the outdoors. This allowed visualization of 3D models of heritage sites to be superimposed over the video stream from the outside environment [29], visualizing virtual points of interest (POIs) overlaid on top of the phone's camera view [30], or textual annotation of outdoor locations based on GPS measurements [31]. Reference [32] proposed an application for outdoor site exploration throughout different periods of time, enriching travel experiences with important historic facts.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobile Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage: Following the Footsteps of Ovid among Different Locations in Europe

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are many examples of cultural events that distinguish people nationally. Celebrating this can bring people closer, as inhabitants of different countries share similar cultural values. This study investigates a sustainable way to enhance these types of events. On the occasion of the 2000-year anniversary of the death of the Roman poet Ovid, we propose a mobile augmented reality (MAR) application that contains historical information related to his life. As Ovid often stated in his last poems, he feared his work would be forgotten after his exile from Rome. This paper focuses on assessing whether this is the case, while also disseminating factual, historic data to people who tested the application. Experiments were conducted in Italy and Romania, in three different cities: Sulmona, Rome, and Constanta. Based on the results collected, four constructs were investigated: comprehensibility, manipulability, enjoyment, and usefulness. The results revealed that the usability of the MAR application, and the interaction metaphor, are appropriate for the general public. The MAR application provided a positive experience, and thus, increased the extent of the occasion.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobile Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage: Following the Footsteps of Ovid among Different Locations in Europe

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unlike to indoor AR, outdoor AR is not subject to spatial restrictions. Indoor AR used a marker to ensure suitable synthesis of virtual object because it happens in relative narrow space, while outdoor AR used location information; it does not use any marker like in indoor system because it happens in relatively wide area [50]. Often the lack of ideal conditions means that marker-based tracking systems cannot be used, leading to rely on other techniques, for example, GPS and inertial sensors, which can be inexact.…”

Section: Augmented Reality For Outdoor Heritage Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Heritage in Marker-Less Augmented Reality: A Survey

Kolivand¹,

Rhalibi²,

Tajdini³

et al. 2019

Advanced Methods and New Materials for Cultural Heritage Preservation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmented reality (AR) is considered as one of the most significant technologies in the field of computer graphics and is utilised in many applications. In this chapter, we have presented a brief comprehensive survey of cultural heritage using augmented reality systems. This survey describes the main objectives and characteristics of marker-less augmented reality systems through presenting up-to-date research results in this area. We describe the marker-less technologies in the area of AR, indoor marker-less AR, outdoor marker-less AR, real-time solutions to the tracking problem, real-time registration, cultural heritage in AR, 3D remonstration techniques, as well as presenting the problems in each research.

show abstract

“…设计、工程和建设 [20] 等领域；据由权威游戏市场调查公司Digi-Capital平台发布的《2015年AR/VR发展报告》估计，到2020年，AR技术的市场份额将达到近1 200亿美元，比2014年激增近5万倍 [21] 。在城市规划设计领域，AR也作为一种新技术推动了文化遗产保护 [22] [23] 与智慧城市建设 [24] [25] 。近年来，城市规划与设计的决策越发注重吸纳所有利益相关方的意见(包括普通居民和城市管理者) [26] ；另一方面，在高密度城市环境中进行建设需遵循的规划设计条例十分复杂，非专业人士往往对其并不了解 [2] [10] ，在上述决策中的参与度非常有限。因此，公众参与者迫切需要了解城市规划设计条例的渠道。当前的虚拟现实(VR)等技术虽然已能实现城市规划与设计方案的3D可视化与虚拟漫游等功能，但无法在虚拟建筑模型与真实建筑之间建立直观联系 [27] 1. The permitted buildings of the category I exclusively low-rise residential zone include residential buildings which are also used as small shops or offices and elementary / junior high school buildings; In addition to elementary / junior high school buildings, certain types of the permitted buildings of the category II exclusively low-rise residential zone include shop buildings with a floor area of up to 150 m 2 are permitted.…”

Section: 引言unclassified

“…According to the "AR / VR Q2 Report 2015" from Digi-Capital, an authorized investigation company of the game industry, the AR market is going to reach USD 120 billion by 2020, nearly 50,000 times of that in 2014 [21] . In urban planning and design, AR is also used as a new tool for cultural heritage conservation [22] [23] and smart city construction [24] [25] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%