2010
DOI: 10.3109/00016481003602108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT imaging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence: Added value of reformatted images

Abstract: Ninety-three patients were included in the study. Nineteen patients with semicircular canal dehiscence were detected. The mean age of the study group was 45 years. Radiologic evidence of SSCD occurred in 23 of 186 temporal bones with a radiologic prevalence of 12%. The most common symptoms in dehiscent patients were vertigo, hearing loss and tinnitus. Defect lengths varied between 1 mm and 6.5 mm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(49 reference statements)
4
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9,[12][13][14] However, significant differences have been found between autopsy-proven versus CT-detected SSC dehiscence. [15][16][17] It has been proposed that reformatted CT images oriented parallel (plane of Po¨schl) and orthogonal (plane of Stenver) to the plane of the SSC may improve the sensitivity and specificity in detecting SSC dehiscence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,[12][13][14] However, significant differences have been found between autopsy-proven versus CT-detected SSC dehiscence. [15][16][17] It has been proposed that reformatted CT images oriented parallel (plane of Po¨schl) and orthogonal (plane of Stenver) to the plane of the SSC may improve the sensitivity and specificity in detecting SSC dehiscence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…17,21 Previous studies suggest that radiologic evidence of SSC dehiscence may be overestimated, indicating that a dehiscence at the arcuate eminence may be observed in asymptomatic patients. 14,16,17 It should be pointed out, however, that these studies are based on older scanning protocols with 1.0-mmthick direct transverse and coronal images, or with 1.0-mm-thick reformatted images in the plane of Po¨schl and Stenver.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la actualidad, a pesar de la resolución de los mé-todos de diagnóstico por imagen, existen discrepancias sobre la prevalencia real de dicho síndrome ya que los estudios radiológicos nos indican porcentajes marcadamente superiores que los anatómicos. Así mediante medidas realizadas sobre CT de temporales, Crovetto et al encuentran una incidencia del 3,6% en su serie de 604 temporales, cifra que llega al 4% en la serie de Cloutier et al (2008) y al 9% en el estudio de Williamson et al (2003) encontrando otros autores incidencias incluso superiores (Ceylan et al, 2010;Piton et al, 2008). En cambio en estudios realizados post-mortem y en piezas de osario se calcula que el porcentaje de sujetos afectos de este tipo de dehiscencia en la zona superior del canal es aproximadamente de 0,5% para Carey et al (2000), y para Tsunoda & Terasaki (2002) del 0,4% en huesos aislados y del 1,4 % (1 caso de 69) en cadáveres.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Although 1-mm thick direct coronal images have a high sensitivity for the detection of SCDS, they have poor specificity when they are compared with submillimeter helical acquisition with reformations [21][22][23]. The CT positive predictive value to detect SCDS using ultrahigh resolution and reconstruction in SC plan, was 93% with a collimation of 0.5 mm and only 50% with a collimation of 1 mm.…”
Section: Ct Scanmentioning
confidence: 91%