2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CryoSat-2 Full Bit Rate Level 1A processing and validation for inland water applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equivalent products from older satellites (CryoSat-2, Jason-2 and Saral-Altika, for instance; see Figure 1) have been used to assess the quality improvement provided by more recent Sentinel data (Wiese et al, 2018). For this purpose, the new retracker SAMOSA++ (Dinardo et al, 2020) has been assessed against coupled model simulations and in-situ observations, analyzing the under-performance over coastal waters (Moore et al, 2018;Fenoglio et al, 2021). The new retracker profits from the extra-waveform information now available out of the L1B SAR processing and conforms to a single step retracker, allowing a seamless approach between ocean and coastal domains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalent products from older satellites (CryoSat-2, Jason-2 and Saral-Altika, for instance; see Figure 1) have been used to assess the quality improvement provided by more recent Sentinel data (Wiese et al, 2018). For this purpose, the new retracker SAMOSA++ (Dinardo et al, 2020) has been assessed against coupled model simulations and in-situ observations, analyzing the under-performance over coastal waters (Moore et al, 2018;Fenoglio et al, 2021). The new retracker profits from the extra-waveform information now available out of the L1B SAR processing and conforms to a single step retracker, allowing a seamless approach between ocean and coastal domains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is a fully analytical SAR SAMOSA-2 retracker (Ray et al, 2015), which fits the theoretically modeled multi-look L1B waveform to the real L1B SAR waveform by using the Levenberg-Marquardt method and retrieving the geophysical variables range, backscatter coefficient, mispointing, and quality information. In the G-POD data set, the SAR SAMOSA+ retracker (Dinardo et al, 2017) was used, which includes application of a Hamming window and thus noise reduction (Moore et al, 2018). The hooking effect is thought to be negligible in SAR due to the smaller footprint and since only across-track off ranging will contribute to this error.…”
Section: Deriving Altimetric Water Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tarpanelli et al (2017), for the Niger-Benue river, suggested forecasting flood discharge from altimetric water levels, MODIS river width, and rating-curve calibration, however with in situ measurements of water levels being available. Others have proposed simulating discharge using fully fledged calibrated and validated land surface modeling (Pedinotti et al, 2012;Casse et al, 2016;Fleischmann et al, 2018;Poméon et al, 2018), assimilating altimetric levels into elaborate hydrodynamic modeling (Munier et al, 2015), or interpolating discharge based on empirical dynamic models trained on gauge discharge (Tourian et al, 2017); however such models are not always available and are less straightforward to transfer to new regions. Therefore we propose combining simplified hydrological models with radar altimetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of previous studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] focus on relatively large water bodies with a scale of several kilometers. One of the first studies employing satellite altimetry for inland water level extraction was performed by Koblinsky et al [12], who processed Geodetic Satellite (Geosat) waveforms to estimate the water levels at four sites in the Amazon basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%