Introduction Chrysanthemum has a great share in the floristic market (Zalewska et al., 2010). The number of available cultivars is, in fact, impossible to estimate. In order to protect the genetic resources in a small area and at reduced costs, cryopreservation techniques can be applied. Attempts to store chrysanthemum plant material in liquid nitrogen (LN) have been made since 1990 (Fukai and Oe, 1990). In vitrogrown shoot tips are most suitable for cryopreservation (Lee et al., 2011; Kaya et al., 2013; Souza et al., 2016). Unfortunately, there are still some problems, such as low viability or regeneration potential of the cryopreserved chrysanthemum tissues (Osorio-Saenz et al., 2011), their hyperhydricity (Wang et al., 2014), disturbance of the chimeric structure (Fukai et al., 1994), or DNA sequence alternations (Martín and González-Benito, 2009; Kaya and Souza, 2017). With that in mind, optimization research on chrysanthemum cryopreservation procedures is still being carried out to make the process more efficient. Previous results clearly underline that the preculture and pretreatment of tissues prior to storage in LN, as well as post-rewarming (recovery) culture conditions, significantly influence the cryopreservation protocol success (Zalewska and Kulus, 2013, 2014; Kaya et al., 2016; Souza et al., 2017). Preculture (hardening) on a properly modified, usually solid, medium increases the stress tolerance of explants, associated with their further pretreatment: dehydration (osmotic and/or physical-air desiccation/drying) and storage in LN (Ozudogru et al., 2010, 2011; Kulus, 2015). The survival rate and, most importantly, the recovery efficiency (a further shoot development potential) of LN-stored explants are essential factors determining the cryopreservation efficiency. Over time several cryopreserved cell viability tests were developed: determination of volatile hydrocarbon stress markers (ethylene, hydroxyl radicals, and lipid peroxidation products); peptide profile evaluation; chlorophyll content and phosphatase or peroxidase activity analysis (Verleysen et al.