2012
DOI: 10.15517/rbt.v60i4.2179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustaceans from a tropical estuarine sand-mud flat, Pacific, Costa Rica, (1984-1988) revisited

Abstract: Abstract:The availability of data sets for time periods of more than a year is scarce for tropical environments. Advances in hardware and software speed-up the re-analysis of old data sets and facilitates the description of population oscillations. Using recent taxonomic literature and software we have updated and re-analized the information on crustacean diversity and population fluctuations from a set of cores collected at a mud-sand flat in the mid upper Gulf of Nicoya estuary, Pacific coast of Costa Rica (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his re-examination of the holotype of Persephona subovata (Rathbun, 1894), Hendrickx [ 19 ] noted its strong similarity to Iliacantha hancocki Rathbun, 1935, with these differing only in the size of peripheral carapace granules and the relative distance between posterior teeth. While he did not synonymize these species he noted they should at very least not be assigned to different genera, though the matter thus far has remained unresolved [ 3 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his re-examination of the holotype of Persephona subovata (Rathbun, 1894), Hendrickx [ 19 ] noted its strong similarity to Iliacantha hancocki Rathbun, 1935, with these differing only in the size of peripheral carapace granules and the relative distance between posterior teeth. While he did not synonymize these species he noted they should at very least not be assigned to different genera, though the matter thus far has remained unresolved [ 3 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40, figure 2; 1962, p. 191; Haig et al , 1970, pp. 26, 29; Hendricks, 1993a, p. 7, b, p. 310, list 11; Hendricks & Harvey, 1999, p. 378; Boschi, 2000, p. 93; Vargas & Cortés, 2004, p. 467, Table 1; Hendricks et al , 2005, p. 175; García-Madrigal & Andréu-Sánchez, 2009, p. 52; Osawa & McLaughlin, 2010, p. 111; Vargas-Zamora et al , 2012, p. 1766.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%