Cross-Validation of Mental Health Recovery Measures in a Hong Kong Chinese Sample

Ye, Shengquan; Pan, Jia-Yan; Wong, Daniel Fu Keung; Bola, John R.

doi:10.1177/1049731512471861

Cited by 26 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The resulting 32-item RSA-R had very high internal consistency reliability of .96, and the total RSA-R scale score was positively correlated with POP-R (.41), MHRM (.39), and the WHOQOL (.33) again providing some partial evidence of convergent and concurrent validity of the measures (Ye et al, 2013). In this study, family members were asked to complete the original 36-item family member version of the scale (RSA-F).…”

Section: Rsa O'mentioning

confidence: 82%

“…The recovery-promoting environment scale (RSA) had high internal consistency (α > .90) and was moderately correlated with each of the recovery measures (RSA and MHRM, r = .39; RSA and POP-R, r = .41) and with the QOL (r = .33). This study provides preliminary evidence of internal consistency reliability and partial construct validity for these two recovery measures in Hong Kong (Ye et al, 2013).…”

Section: Developing Service User Measures Of "Personal" Recoverymentioning

confidence: 88%

“…The same two measures of personal recovery (MHRM and POP-R) and the RSA employed in the Ye, Pan, Wong, and Bola (2013) study were used along with the PRI developed in Hong Kong by Chen et al (2005), specifically for individuals recovering from an initial episode of psychosis. Both the person in recovery version and the family version of the RSA were used.…”

Section: Building a Recovery Orientation In Hong Kongmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-Validating Chinese Language Mental Health Recovery Measures in Hong Kong

Bola

Chan

Chen

et al. 2016

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Promoting recovery in mental health services is hampered by a shortage of reliable and valid measures, particularly in Hong Kong. We seek to cross validate two Chinese language measures of recovery and one of recovery-promoting environments. Method: A cross-sectional survey of people recovering from early episode psychosis (n = 121) and family members (n = 49) was taken. Two recovery measures, the Mental Health Recovery Measure and the recovery subscale of the Peer Outcomes Protocol, and one measure of recovery-promoting environments, the Recovery Self-Assessment, were used. The Psychosis Recovery Inventory was incorporated to assess construct validity. Results: Internal consistency reliability for each measure was high (r = .71-.94); one-factor solutions were parsimonious. People in recovery rated their risk for relapse lower than did their family members. Conclusions: Moderately strong positive correlations among recovery measures lend support to construct validity. Several "recovery-promoting environment" items should be reassessed for cultural fit in Hong Kong.

show abstract

Section: Rsa O'mentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Developing Service User Measures Of "Personal" Recoverymentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Building a Recovery Orientation In Hong Kongmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross-Validating Chinese Language Mental Health Recovery Measures in Hong Kong

Bola

Chan

Chen

et al. 2016

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…L'échelle de réponse est de type Likert, avec 5 niveaux allant de fortement en désaccord (1) à fortement en accord (5). Le RSA a des propriétés psychométriques de modérées à fortes en termes de validité et de fidélité (McLoughlin, Du Wick, Collazzi et Puntill, 2013 ;Ye, Pan, Keung Wong et Bola, 2013). Une recension systématique des mesures de rétablissement a estimé que seul le RSA a une cohérence interne adéquate (alpha entre 0,76 et 0,90) et qu'il est aussi parmi les meilleures mesures en regard de sa base conceptuelle (Williams et coll., 2012).…”

Section: Cueillette Des Données : Outils Et Procédureunclassified

Les visions du rétablissement dans des services résidentiels en santé mentale d’une région québécoise

Larivière

Gauthier-Boudreault

Morin

et al. 2020

smq

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Partial hospitalization programs in the United States were also found to be recovery-oriented using the RSA (Yanos, Vreeland, Minsky, Fuller, & Roe, 2009). Burgess, Pirkis, Coombs, and Rosen (2011) identified the RSA as a strong candidate for routine use in the Australian public sector based on an evaluation of 11 recovery measures for mental health services, whereas Ye et al (2013) translated and validated the RSA for use with Chinese populations.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resident and proprietor perspectives on a recovery orientation in community-based housing.

Piat¹,

Boyer²,

Fleury³

et al. 2015

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective-Stable housing is a fundamental human right, and an important element for both mental health recovery and social inclusion among people with serious mental illness. This article reports findings from a study on the recovery orientation of structured congregate community housing services using the Recovery Self-Assessment Questionnaire (RSA) adapted for housing (O'Connell, Tondora, Croog, Evans, & Davidson, 2005).Methods-The RSA questionnaires were administered to 118 residents and housing providers from 112 congregate housing units located in Montreal, Canada.Results-Residents rated their homes as significantly less recovery-oriented than did proprietors, which is contrary to previous studies of clinical services or Assertive Community Treatment where RSA scores for service users were significantly higher than service provider scores. Findings for both groups suggest the need for improvement on 5 of 6 RSA factors. While proprietors favored recovery training and education, and valued resident opinion and experience, vestiges of a traditional medical model governing this housing emerged in other findings, as in agreement between the 2 groups that residents have little choice in case management, or in the belief among proprietors that residents are unable to manage their symptoms. Research on housing for people with SMI increasingly favors independent, supported, housing over traditional congregate models such as foster homes or group homes. While supported housing is considered a fundamental improvement in housing for this population (Nelson, 2010), no single, evidence-based model of housing has emerged to guide research and practice (Rog, 2004;Tabol, Drebing, & Rosenheck, 2010). Studies have revealed substantial differences in staffing, levels of support, and environmental characteristics among different housing types, as well as definitional confusion (Isaac, 2007;Priebe, Saidi, Want, Mangalore, & Knapp, 2009). One meta-analysis suggested the need to examine outcomes in terms of different population subgroups (Leff et al., 2009). Conclusions and Implications for Practice-ThisResearch on housing preferences consistently shows that people with SMI prefer independent housing with low restrictiveness and supports as needed (Fakhoury, Murray, Shepherd, & Priebe, 2002;Forchuk, Nelson, & Hall, 2006;. Living in one's preferred home predicts successful outcomes and is associated with perceived choice and control over the environment (Boydell, 2006;Nelson, Sylvestre, Aubry, George, & Trainor, 2007). By contrast, service providers tend to endorse structured settings such as group homes for their clients (Corrigan, Mueser, Bond, Drake, & Solomon, 2008;Tsai, Bond, Salyers, Godfrey, & Davis, 2010). Residents in congregate housing may also prefer that model for the security it provides, particularly when age and physical health concerns are taken into account (White, 2013;.Other research has identified key elements in recovery-oriented housing, beginning with the assumption that residents are full citizens wi...

show abstract

Cross-Validation of Mental Health Recovery Measures in a Hong Kong Chinese Sample

Cited by 26 publications

References 53 publications

Cross-Validating Chinese Language Mental Health Recovery Measures in Hong Kong

Cross-Validating Chinese Language Mental Health Recovery Measures in Hong Kong

Les visions du rétablissement dans des services résidentiels en santé mentale d’une région québécoise

Resident and proprietor perspectives on a recovery orientation in community-based housing.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About