1973
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.31.1563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Sections and Charged-Particle Multiplicities at 102 and 405 GeV/c

Abstract: We have measured the total inelastic cross section (o-jnel) a^d charged-particle multiplicities obtained mpp collisions at 405 GeV/c. The data are from a preliminary 12 000picture bubble-chamber exposure. We find cri^ei^ 32.8±1.0 mb; the low moments of the multiplicity distribution for negative particles are (??-)-3.50±0.07, D^ =2.37±0.05, f{ = 2.1±0.2, and/g" =0.1±0.9. We also present updated results at 102 GeV/c.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values obtained from Eq. (2) for the AA mean multiplicity are based on: nonsingle diffractivepp collisions at FNAL by the E735 experiment [7,24], at CERN by the UA5 experiment at √ spp = 546 GeV [25] and √ spp = 200 and 900 GeV [26]; pp collisions from CERN-ISR [27], and from the inelastic data from the bubble chamber experiments [28][29][30], the latter having been compiled and analyzed in [31]. The LHC multiplicities in pp interactions are calculated using the hybrid fit obtained here, Eq.…”
Section: The Participant Dissipating Energy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values obtained from Eq. (2) for the AA mean multiplicity are based on: nonsingle diffractivepp collisions at FNAL by the E735 experiment [7,24], at CERN by the UA5 experiment at √ spp = 546 GeV [25] and √ spp = 200 and 900 GeV [26]; pp collisions from CERN-ISR [27], and from the inelastic data from the bubble chamber experiments [28][29][30], the latter having been compiled and analyzed in [31]. The LHC multiplicities in pp interactions are calculated using the hybrid fit obtained here, Eq.…”
Section: The Participant Dissipating Energy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…energy dependence of the charged particle mean multiplicity in pp/pp collisions. The measurements are taken from: nonsingle diffractivepp collisions at FNAL by the E735 experiment[7,24], at CERN by the UA5 experiment at √ spp = 546 GeV[25] and √ spp = 200 and 900 GeV[26]; pp collisions from CERN-ISR[27], and from the inelastic data from the bubble chamber experiments[28][29][30][31]44].The solid line shows the hybrid fit, 1.60−0.03 ln(spp)+0.18 ln 2 (spp)+0.03 s 0.29 pp , the dotted line shows the power-law fit, −7.36+6.97 s 0.133 pp , and the dashed line shows the second-order log fit, 3.18−0.57 ln(spp)+0.216 ln 2 (spp). The open stars show the predictions by the PDE approach with the error bars of 5% uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) are shown in Fig. 9 which shows the best agreement between calculated by GPII model and the corresponding experimental data [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] 3 . The monotonic increase of with √ is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data of p-p interactions have been measured, by using different giant accelerators and from cosmic rays, over the largest range of energies (up to √ ≈ 63 GeV for the multiplicity distribution, up to √ ≈ 10 3 GeV for the average multiplicity and up to √ ≈ 10 TeV for the total cross sections) [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] 1 . The GP is implemented using the experimental data to produce three different models, GPI, GPII, and GPIII that will simulate ( ), and (σ ), respectively, for the p-p interactions at the given range of energies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the fits to the negatively charged particle multiplicity distributions in inelastic pp collisions[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Results of the fits to the negatively charged particle multiplicity distributions in pp interactions[2,40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%