1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(79)80105-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-reactions between ethylenediamine tetraacetate and ethylenediamine hydrochloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other investigators, however, have stated that EDTA is not a contact sensitizer (Fisher 1979;Rietschel and Fowler 1995). Fisher (1979) reported that no positive reactions were observed when EDTA was included in the North American Contact Dermatitis Group's screening tray for several years, and that EDTA (Table 17). If products were tested more than once, the formula with the highest concentration of EDTA was reported.…”
Section: Skin Irritation and Sensitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other investigators, however, have stated that EDTA is not a contact sensitizer (Fisher 1979;Rietschel and Fowler 1995). Fisher (1979) reported that no positive reactions were observed when EDTA was included in the North American Contact Dermatitis Group's screening tray for several years, and that EDTA (Table 17). If products were tested more than once, the formula with the highest concentration of EDTA was reported.…”
Section: Skin Irritation and Sensitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%