2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00294-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural invariance of measures of satisfaction and service quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 40 relevant articles were located, covering 11 years of research published from 1996 to 2006. Earlier Knight (1999) reviewed international services marketing studies from a firm's perspective (1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998), focusing, for example, on issues like mode of entry. Our review covers cross-cultural services from a different perspective-from the perspective of the consumer and only overlaps with Knight by 3 years.…”
Section: Article Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 40 relevant articles were located, covering 11 years of research published from 1996 to 2006. Earlier Knight (1999) reviewed international services marketing studies from a firm's perspective (1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998), focusing, for example, on issues like mode of entry. Our review covers cross-cultural services from a different perspective-from the perspective of the consumer and only overlaps with Knight by 3 years.…”
Section: Article Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bitner and Hubbert (1994) defined service quality as the customers' overall impression of the relative inferiority or superiority of the organization and its services. Ueltschy et al (2004) defined service quality as the consumer's judgment about the overall excellence or superiority of the service. Service quality is not objectively measured according to some technical standards but is subjectively felt by customers and measured relative to customer-determined standards (Kwortnik, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived service quality is a function of the direction and magnitude of the comparison of expected and perceived service (Parasuraman et al, 1985), whereas satisfaction is a function of the direction and magnitude of disconfirmation experience of expectations (Peterson and Wilson, 1992). The two concepts differ in that the former is a general belief toward a service based on cognitive judgment and the latter is an attitudinal assessment of a service, which has both cognitive and affective components (Ueltschy et al, 2004). Although the cognitive components help to determine overall satisfaction after a service, satisfaction is largely explained by affect during a service encounter (Homburg et al, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%