Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability Process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish Population

Öksüz, Çiğdem; Akel, Burcu Semin; Oskay, Deran; Leblebicioğlu, Gürsel; Hayran, Kadir Mutlu

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.016

Cited by 53 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…13 In Turkish version, the least correlation was found between work performance subscale of the MHOQ and work subscale of DASH (r ¼ À0:4) and between aesthetic subscale of the MHOQ and disability/symptom of the DASH (r ¼ À0:33). 12 In our study, the total MHOQ and most of the subscales had significant correlation with the DASH and its subscales, except pain and aesthetic subscales of the MHOQ with work and sport subscales of the DASH which are still concordant in the direction of what they are supposed to measure. Somewhat similar results also were reported in the other studies.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 44%

“…Turkish, Korean and Dutch versions also applied the DASH questionnaire to test for the convergent validity of the MHOQ. [12][13][14] The results of Korean version demonstrated high correlations between pain subscale of the MHOQ and DASH score with a value of 0.63. 13 On the other side, the least correlation was between satisfaction subscale of the MHOQ and work subscale of the DASH (r ¼ À0:17).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Calculated Cronbach's alpha in Korean, Turkish, Colombian and original English versions was 0.79-0.97, 0.85-0.96, 0.92 and 0.86-0.97, respectively. 3 , 12 , 13 , 17 The calculated ICC for reliability testing of Turkish version ranged from 0.79 to 0.96 (12) and for Korean version, from 0.88 to 0.96 (see Ref. 13) for the 6 subscales.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The MHOQ is validated and adapted in various languages and hand disorders. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Internal consistency is an important property for psychometric measurement of a questionnaire that is expected to measure a concept by multiple questions. Calculated Cronbach's alpha in Korean, Turkish, Colombian and original English versions was 0.79-0.97, 0.85-0.96, 0.92 and 0.86-0.97, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire Among Persian Population

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We aimed to validate a cross-culturally adapted version of the Persian Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ). We followed the Beaton's guideline to translate the questionnaire to Persian. We administered the final version to 223 patients among which 79 patients returned 3 days later to respond to the Persian MHOQ for the second time. In the first visit, respondents also filled the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and rated the pain based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Cronbach's alpha for the total MHOQ was 0.79 which showed good internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total MHOQ was 0.84 which demonstrated good reliability between test and retest. The absolute correlation coefficient between total MHOQ and the DASH was as high as 0.74. Persian version of the MHOQ proved to be a reliable and valid instrument to be implemented among Persian population with the hand and wrist disorders.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 44%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire Among Persian Population

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating better hand performance. The Turkish version of the MHOQ (MHOG‐T) was validated in 2013 by Öksüz et al The scale has been validated in patients with RA by Waljee et al…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity of the Patient‐Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Patient‐Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) is a patient‐reported questionnaire focusing on symptoms and function in wrist pathologies. It consists of 15 questions regarding pain and functional activities of the wrist. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multi‐systemic disease characterized by inflammation of the wrist and hand joints in almost all patients. This study aims to test the validity of PRWE in patients with RA. Method Seventy‐five patients with RA from a single outpatient clinic participated in the study. Patients filled out the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) and grip strength of both hands were measured. Patients filled out the PRWE questionnaire consecutively once for the dominant and once for the non‐dominant hand. Correlations between PRWE and MHOQ and grip strength scores were analyzed by Spearman's correlation method. Results Our results demonstrated that there was a very strong correlation between the PRWE and the MHOQ and a moderate correlation between the PRWE and grip strength (P < .001). PRWE also showed negative and fair correlation with grip strength of both hands (P < .001). Conclusions The Patient‐Rated Wrist Evaluation is a valid tool for evaluating wrist involvement in patients with RA. PRWE may be preferred in the busy clinical setting since it has simple and short questions. Additionally, it may provide a sensitive follow‐up tool for patients separately using its subscales of pain and function.

show abstract

Measurement Properties of the German Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in Patients With Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Marks

Audigé

Herren

et al. 2014

Arthritis Care & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability Process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish Population

Cited by 53 publications

References 18 publications

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire Among Persian Population

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire Among Persian Population

Validity of the Patient‐Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis

Measurement Properties of the German Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in Patients With Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About