Cross‐benchmarking international competitiveness and performance in human language technologies

Abstract

Purpose -Competitive success as a nation requires balancing commercial innovativeness and social welfare, which results in a sound basis for socio-economic development. All potential resources -including entrepreneurial activity and innovations -can be utilized as promoters of competitiveness and welfare. Thus, useful lessons for general national competitiveness can be learned from benchmarking individual innovations and perhaps even more so, from those less glamorized technologies such as human language technologies (HLT). Finnish researchers are considered to be at the leading edge of developments in a number of ICT fields. The main responsibility for the utilization of knowledge is seen, necessarily, to rest with the public sector, while the legislative framework is considered to favour entrepreneurship and innovation. Aims to discuss the issues. Design/methodology/approach -National competitiveness and HLT benchmarking pose a number of interesting questions and issues both macro and micro levels. For example: the extent to which benchmark performance in HLT is consistent with national competitiveness; link between robustness of research effort in any particular language community and effectiveness of technology transfer to market; and fostering and funding of entrepreneurial activity in HLT in the successful (benchmarked) countries and the fit with national vision and innovation policy. For the first two areas, relationships between HLT benchmark and comparative national competitiveness of top countries are examined through comparison of their respective primitive dimensions. Data sources include official and quasi-official public documents. The final stage is explored using a case study approach and comparative assessment against extant entrepreneurship literature.Findings -There appears to be no direct link between robustness of the HLT research effort in any particular language community and actual effectiveness of technology transfer to market. None the less, success in the Finnish HLT benchmark appears to correlate with the country's international competitiveness standing and "social innovation policy" paradigm. Its knowledge society model has clearly resulted in a sound basis for its socio-economic development, where all potential resources -including its entrepreneurial base -and innovations, can be utilized as promoters of competitiveness and welfare. Within this entrepreneurial base, HLT SMEs tend to seek scale economies through internationalise at the early stages of development. Originality/value -The paper shows that Finland is well placed to meet the challenges and to capitalise on the economic and social opportunities, given its strength in ICT/HLT innovation policy country's open self-criticism of the latter.

Evolving benchmarking practices: a review for research perspectives

“…When benchmarking is applied in a large-scale setting such as a whole region or government, how should it be effectively modified and what factors need to be considered? Benchmarking measures and tools continue to evolve as they are used for global competitive analyses, the achievement of effective global collaborative policies among the G20 nations, the implementation of infrastructure policy among developing nations, the achievement of effective negotiations on free trade policy decisions, and the extension of membership of regional or global bodies to other nations (Kenny and Meaton, 2007;Ibrahim et al, 2010;Tavana and O'Connor, 2010).…”

“…Firms have used benchmarking based on diverse perspectives. Many firms have taken benchmarking as a critical business model for enhancing organizational competitiveness (Fawcett et al, 2009a;Kenny and Meaton, 2007). Such organizational-level research focuses on the effect of organizational factors (e.g.…”

Towards objective benchmarking of electronic government: an inter‐country analysis

“…Comparing and evaluating the relative performance of countries on e‐government in an objective manner is of great significance for understanding the relative status of individual countries on e‐government (West, 2006; Al‐Mashari, 2007). Such a study is often carried out in terms of benchmarking e‐government (Graafland‐Essers and Ettedgui, 2003; Kenny and Meaton, 2007; Salem, 2007) for comparing inter‐country e‐government performance in which the performance of individual countries on e‐government is compared with the best practitioners, leading to the identification of the performance gaps between each country and the best practitioners and the development of fresh approaches in e‐government for improve the performance of those countries on e‐government.…”

Las ventajas competitivas en las organizaciones a través de la innovación en la investigación

“…De igual manera, el éxito del benchmarking está fuertemente relacionado con la competitividad y es probablemente una razón por la que se ha aplicado cada vez más en las organizaciones. En general, el benchmarking trata de entender porque existen diferencias en el rendimiento y como un rendimiento superior puede ser logrado (Kenny & Meaton, 2007).…”