The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cropping practices impact fungal endophytes and pathogens in durum wheat roots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Berg et al (2005) found Trichoderma and other Verticillium antagonists such as Penicillium and Monographella to vary in diversity and abundance across sites and among host plant (strawberry and oilseed rape) rhizosphere soils. Recently, Taheri et al (2016) reported that fungal antagonist communities differed depending on the identity of the legume in crop rotation. Unfortunately, understanding of the mechanisms by which plant communities selectively amplify disease-protective fungi does not go beyond single plant species or genotypes (Hartmann et al 2009).…”
Section: Disease-protective Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Berg et al (2005) found Trichoderma and other Verticillium antagonists such as Penicillium and Monographella to vary in diversity and abundance across sites and among host plant (strawberry and oilseed rape) rhizosphere soils. Recently, Taheri et al (2016) reported that fungal antagonist communities differed depending on the identity of the legume in crop rotation. Unfortunately, understanding of the mechanisms by which plant communities selectively amplify disease-protective fungi does not go beyond single plant species or genotypes (Hartmann et al 2009).…”
Section: Disease-protective Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, we found that plant density had a significant effect on aboveground dry matter accumulation in intercropping (Yin et al, 2017), suggesting that the belowground interspecies interactions may also stimulate the growth of the aboveground plant parts. Furthermore, the outcome of the recovery effect may be related to other soil-related factors because soil environments in the rooting zone are complex in nature and are affected by many factors, such as soil water availability (Niu et al, 2017), and soil physical (Luo et al, 2017), chemical (Grant et al, 2016), and biological (Taheri et al, 2016) properties. Agronomic practices may also affect the outcome of the recovery such as preceding crops in the rotation (Luce et al, 2016), tillage practices (Lupwayi et al, 2015), and soil microbial community structure and functionalities (Borrell et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant innovation in the durum wheat agronomy on the Canadian prairie is the discovery of the association between durum wheat productivity and soil microbial community. A number of studies have shown that, in pulse-durum rotations, the preceding pulse crops influence microbial community in the soil, the root, and in the rhizosphere of the subsequent durum wheat [80,81,127]. The stimulation of soil microbial community with preceding pulses promotes the stand establishment, root growth, and grain yield of the subsequent durum wheat [80,81,128].…”
Section: Optimizing Feedback Benefits From Soil Microbiomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dry pea matures about 40 to 70 days earlier than chickpea under the southwestern Saskatchewan conditions; this influences the abundance of endophytic fungal antagonist hosted by the following durum wheat. In a 3-year field study, it was found that there were more fungal antagonist after early-maturing pea than after the long-season chickpea [127]. The endophytic fungal antagonists in the pea roots may function as root disease protectors for their host.…”
Section: Pulse Terminationmentioning
confidence: 99%