Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques 2009
DOI: 10.4135/9781452226569.n3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
180
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For each constructed pdf, the associated 5 th percentile (lower-threshold), 50 th percentile (crossover) and 95 th percentile (upper-threshold) were identified. Adhering to the philosophy of both quantitative and qualitative assessment of the selection of qualitative anchors (see Rihoux and De Meur, 2009), the surrounding pairs of cases (police forces through their variable values) around these identified qualitative anchor values were qualitatively assessed using the author's theoretical expertise (see also Greckhamer, 2011, for similar case based comparison approach). It followed the 5 th , 50 th and 95 th percentiles were consistently adopted for the three qualitative anchors.…”
Section: Appendix B (Evaluation Of 'Direct Method' Parameters)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each constructed pdf, the associated 5 th percentile (lower-threshold), 50 th percentile (crossover) and 95 th percentile (upper-threshold) were identified. Adhering to the philosophy of both quantitative and qualitative assessment of the selection of qualitative anchors (see Rihoux and De Meur, 2009), the surrounding pairs of cases (police forces through their variable values) around these identified qualitative anchor values were qualitatively assessed using the author's theoretical expertise (see also Greckhamer, 2011, for similar case based comparison approach). It followed the 5 th , 50 th and 95 th percentiles were consistently adopted for the three qualitative anchors.…”
Section: Appendix B (Evaluation Of 'Direct Method' Parameters)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, set-theoretic methods allow for equifinality -that there may be many equally valid paths to the same outcome [32]. Finally, set-theoretic methods are oriented to determining whether a condition or set of conditions are necessary -the condition or set of conditions is always present when the outcome occurs -and/or sufficient -the outcome always occurs when the condition or set of conditions is present [33]. A Boolean algebra-based set-theoretic approach can be used to capture both the causal complexity and equifinality components of configurational relationships in a parsimonious form [34].…”
Section: Qualitative Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A specific form of QCA where the values of the conditions are binary is called crisp set QCA (csQCA), where values for each condition are set to 0 or 1 to denote whether an element is present or absent, ascribed a value of high or low, or is naturally dichotomized variables (male/female) [33]. QCA is ideal when working with an intermediate number of cases (generally defined as 30-50), although there is no procedural limit to greater numbers of cases being used [35].…”
Section: Qualitative Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crisp set QCA is done in six steps [54][55][56] using TOSMANA (Tool for Small-N Analysis) version 1.3.2.0 [57]. It allows a direct conversion of hypotheses into variables (Table 2), which are relevant for all the cases, followed by building of a raw dataset for the cases (Table 3) and construction of a truth table.…”
Section: Crisp Set Qca and An Overview Of The Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%