2011
DOI: 10.3856/vol39-issue2-fulltext-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crecimiento del camaron excavador Parastacus pugnax (Poeppig, 1835) determinado mediante tecnica de marcaje

Abstract: RESUMEN. Para determinar el crecimiento en el camarón excavador (Parastacus pugnax) en la zona centro sur de Chile se utilizó un marbete tipo cinturón. Los parámetros longitud cefalotorácica asintótica (Lc ∞ ) y la velocidad de incremento en longitud y peso (K), se establecieron mediante el método de Gulland & Holt (1959). El parámetro t 0 se determinó mediante la ecuación inversa del modelo de von Bertalanffy, estableciéndose que las curvas de crecimiento en longitud y peso fueron definidas por los parámetros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the growth rates found for males and females, there was similarity and consistency with observations of other crustaceans (e.g., crab A. leptodactyla; prawn Macrobrachium borellii Nobili, 1896 and crayfish Parastacus pugnax Poepping, 1835) (collins, 1996;noro & bucKuP, 2003;ibArrA & ArAnA, 2011). However, the growth rate for females was slightly higher in other species, such as A. paulensis (cohen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Regarding the growth rates found for males and females, there was similarity and consistency with observations of other crustaceans (e.g., crab A. leptodactyla; prawn Macrobrachium borellii Nobili, 1896 and crayfish Parastacus pugnax Poepping, 1835) (collins, 1996;noro & bucKuP, 2003;ibArrA & ArAnA, 2011). However, the growth rate for females was slightly higher in other species, such as A. paulensis (cohen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Nonetheless, certain differences were noticed between the growth rates (K) estimated in both studies, which caused discrepancies in the time required by these species to reach the salable size of 30 mm CL that has been established for S. spinifrons (Rudolph et al, 2010). According to Ibarra & Arana (2011), this would be reached in 3.1 years and according to the present study, in 1.9 years. This discrepancy could be attributed to a possible negative effect in growth when using tags adhered to the body of the organisms or rather to an overestimate of the age when using the modal progression method, as noted by different authors (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In Chile, impacts include siltation caused by deforestation to enable livestock grazing and crop production (Buckup, , ). There are also localized threats such as harvesting for human consumption, using crayfishes as bait for salmon fishing, management of river‐bank vegetation and aquatic macrophytes, physical alterations to the river channel by the extraction of groundwater (Rudolph, ; Buckup, , , ; Ibarra and Arana, ) and the removal of Sphagnum moss, which is the specific habitat of two species ( V . araucanius and V .…”
Section: State Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Chile, impacts include siltation caused by deforestation to enable livestock grazing and crop production (Buckup, 2010a, b). There are also localized threats such as harvesting for human consumption, using crayfishes as bait for salmon fishing, management of river-bank vegetation and aquatic macrophytes, physical alterations to the river channel by the extraction of groundwater (Rudolph, 2002b;Buckup, 2010b, i, j;Ibarra and Arana, 2011) and the removal of Sphagnum moss, which is the specific habitat of two species (V. araucanius and V. retamali), for commercial purposes (Buckup, 2010j, k). Alien species have been identified by IUCN as major threats causing biodiversity loss (IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, 2013) and have documented impact on endemic crayfishes (Lodge et al, 2012;Sousa et al, 2013).…”
Section: Main Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%