2009
DOI: 10.1080/10503300802621180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data: The Ward method

Abstract: The Ward method (1987) offers an iterative approach to consensus building that encourages the development and consideration of each contributor's unique perspectives. Collaborators begin by orienting to the method and project-specific goals and then engage in an iterative process, cycling between individual creative work and group meetings. Meetings serve as opportunities to share ideas within a noncritical atmosphere. Paradoxically, much of the work of reaching consensus occurs while collaborators are working… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The steps taken in the data analyses by the researchers were: (a) reading through the journal entries independently and highlighting comments or phrases that were representative of the participants' experiences, (b) independently creating categories of meaning from the highlighted summary statements, (c) collaborating as a group and reading each line of data and category that the independent reviewer associated with it, (d) engaging in dialogue about why reviewers agreed or disagreed about a theme, (e) and reaching consensual agreement about categorical associations and corresponding data (Schielke et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steps taken in the data analyses by the researchers were: (a) reading through the journal entries independently and highlighting comments or phrases that were representative of the participants' experiences, (b) independently creating categories of meaning from the highlighted summary statements, (c) collaborating as a group and reading each line of data and category that the independent reviewer associated with it, (d) engaging in dialogue about why reviewers agreed or disagreed about a theme, (e) and reaching consensual agreement about categorical associations and corresponding data (Schielke et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cualquier duda o problema surgido se anales de psicología, 2014, vol. 30, nº 1 (enero) resolvió por consenso entre las jueces en la línea de trabajos del grupo de Stiles (Schielke et al, 2009) en una serie intensiva de reuniones y revisiones a lo largo de seis semanas.…”
Section: Procedimientounclassified
“…Ils ont procédé à un accord interjuge selon la méthode Ward (Shielke et al, 2009) ; cette méthode consiste en un processus répétitif qui alterne le travail individuel et les rencontres en groupe. Lors des discussions en groupe, les perspectives individuelles sont confrontées de manière non critique, ce qui permet à chacun de modifier ses considérations en intégrant les idées intéressantes des autres personnes.…”
Section: Méthodeunclassified