2021
DOI: 10.4000/revus.7500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating law of interpretation: a risky or fundamental step?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, the article by Kobalia (2018) examines the main features of centralized and decentralized constitutional review in the context of the modern constitution and state power. Particular attention should be paid to the findings outlined in the article by Konca (2021) on the introduction of a monopoly on constitutional interpretation, which was considered as an institution that harmoniously corresponds to the semantic system arising from modern constitutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In turn, the article by Kobalia (2018) examines the main features of centralized and decentralized constitutional review in the context of the modern constitution and state power. Particular attention should be paid to the findings outlined in the article by Konca (2021) on the introduction of a monopoly on constitutional interpretation, which was considered as an institution that harmoniously corresponds to the semantic system arising from modern constitutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike norms, these principles cannot be applied literally, but must be interpreted. They have the same hierarchical rank, are tangent to each other, and have the same legal sphere (Konca, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%