2018
DOI: 10.1097/nur.0000000000000344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a Research Agenda and Setting Research Priorities for Clinical Nurse Specialists

Abstract: Development of a research agenda and identification of research priorities are a key method of fulfilling the mission and goals of NACNS. The process and outcomes are described in this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…not a critical or systematic review; Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Doosti-Irani and Holakouie-Naieni ( 2016 ) Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Fabbri et al ( 2018 ) Ineligible study design, i.e. not a critical or systematic review; Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Foster et al ( 2018 ) Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Hasson et al ( 2020 ) Duplicate Hill et al ( 2019 ) Ineligible study design, i.e. not a critical or systematic review; Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Knight et al ( 2014 ) Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Johnston et al ( 2016 ) Ineligible study design, i.e.…”
Section: Appendix A: Search Strategy and Summary Of Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…not a critical or systematic review; Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Doosti-Irani and Holakouie-Naieni ( 2016 ) Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Fabbri et al ( 2018 ) Ineligible study design, i.e. not a critical or systematic review; Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Foster et al ( 2018 ) Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Hasson et al ( 2020 ) Duplicate Hill et al ( 2019 ) Ineligible study design, i.e. not a critical or systematic review; Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Knight et al ( 2014 ) Core concept does not evaluate research priority setting exercises Johnston et al ( 2016 ) Ineligible study design, i.e.…”
Section: Appendix A: Search Strategy and Summary Of Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the quality of life of individuals with chronic conditions (Grady & Gullatte, ), patient‐level outcome measures (Davis, Morgans, & Stewart, ), patient self‐management (Grady, ), personalized health strategies, health promotion and patient education are topics that need further research (Foster et al, ; Grady & Gough, ). Grady and Gullatte (; also Grady, ) state that increasing numbers of people are currently living with chronic conditions and managing long‐term illnesses is shifting from health professionals to individuals and their families; consequently, these nursing phenomena ought to be investigated in greater depth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the first phenomenon, long-term care (Brazil, Maitland, Ploeg, & Denton, 2012;Deschodt, Zunica, & Wellens, 2017;Keller, Beck, & Namasivayam, 2015;McGilton et al, 2016;Walsh & Yon, 2012), nursing home settings (Morley et al, 2014;Simmons et al, 2016;Walsh & Yon, 2012), palliative care (Combs, Kluger, & Kutner, 2013;Hanson & Winzelberg, 2013;Henoch et al, 2016;Lunney, 2015;O'Quinn & Giambra, 2014;Ritchie & Zulman, 2013;Schulz, 2013) and basic/fundamental care (Walsh & Yon, 2012) Improving the quality of life of individuals with chronic conditions (Grady & Gullatte, 2014), patient-level outcome measures (Davis, Morgans, & Stewart, 2016), patient self-management (Grady, 2017), personalized health strategies, health promotion and patient education are topics that need further research (Foster et al, 2018;Grady & Gough, 2015). Grady and Gullatte (2014;also Grady, 2017) state that increasing numbers of people are currently living with chronic conditions and managing long-term illnesses is shifting from health professionals to individuals and their families; consequently, these nursing phenomena ought to be investigated in greater depth.…”
Section: Nursing Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Houve ainda a rápida mobilização para oferta de cursos de curta duração para esclarecimento sobre os diferentes aspectos da COVID-19 e seus cuidados para toda a comunidade (20) Os editais de financiamento de projetos de pesquisa no Brasil vão ao encontro dos esforços mundiais na área de investigação científica visando a um maior conhecimento sobre a doença e ao desenvolvimento de uma vacina ou terapêutica capaz de controlar o vírus (29) . Nesse contexto, o enfermeiro como pesquisador, a partir da sua experiência na assistência direta aos pacientes e/ou na gestão do cuidado e serviços de saúde, tem potencial para contribuir com o delineamento de projetos de pesquisa visando à compreensão ou busca de soluções inovadoras para os problemas que envolvem o processo de viver humano e desenvolvimento de uma prática assistencial qualificada e resolutiva (30)(31) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified