2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/abfced
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack detection with gas-coupled laser acoustic detection technique

Abstract: Gas-coupled laser acoustic detection (GCLAD) is an unestablished ultrasonic detection technique based on the displacement that a laser beam sustains when intersected by an acoustic wave travelling in a fluid. In the present work, GCLAD for the noncontact detection of ultrasound is applied to identify surface defects on metal plates. Two GCLAD configurations are analysed, each associated with different sensitivities to cracks; specifically, GCLAD exhibits the highest sensitivity when inclined perpendicularly to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, however, attenuation by the coating or painting stratum would necessarily result in a decrease in the ultrasonic wave amplitude [28]. No information is available on how the system would perform in different environments, for instance considering weather influence; currently, even if signal amplitudes are comparable to those from an ACT [37], additional optimizations from an electronics and a sensitivity standpoint are required for the GCLAD to become as reliable as other non-contact detectors like interferome-Fig. 5 Experimental layout for the steel plate inspection; the dashed rectangles represent locations of the artificial cracks ters for inspection practices: the low signal-to-noise ratio is currently the main factor preventing GCLAD application to industrialized contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, however, attenuation by the coating or painting stratum would necessarily result in a decrease in the ultrasonic wave amplitude [28]. No information is available on how the system would perform in different environments, for instance considering weather influence; currently, even if signal amplitudes are comparable to those from an ACT [37], additional optimizations from an electronics and a sensitivity standpoint are required for the GCLAD to become as reliable as other non-contact detectors like interferome-Fig. 5 Experimental layout for the steel plate inspection; the dashed rectangles represent locations of the artificial cracks ters for inspection practices: the low signal-to-noise ratio is currently the main factor preventing GCLAD application to industrialized contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not, the finite beam size reverses the behavior: a higher response for high acoustic wavelengths is observed, the beam diameter being the same [41]. As a non-contact detection device, GCLAD can sense variations in the refractive index associated with ultrasound induced by different types of contact or non-contact sources, like continuous wave lasers [42][43][44][45][46] or contact piezoelectric probes [37].…”
Section: Gclad Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GCLAD technique has currently few industrial applications and there is no evidence of implementation in NDT processes. The knowledge on the physical principles that regulate the detection, useful for optimizing the GCLAD technique for NDT applications, has recently been deepened in some studies by the authors [27,28]: the GCLAD system can be exploited in various experimental configurations, obtaining the maximum sensitivity in configurations in which the interaction zone between the probe laser beam and the ultrasonic wave refracted in air is maximized; the system also proves to be selective with respect to the mutual orientation of the wavefront and the laser beam, enabling to exclude a large number of uninteresting ultrasonic components from the detected signal. The study also illustrates how the GCLAD system allows detecting Surface Acoustic Waves (SAWs) refracted in the air from any point belonging to a line on the surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to obtain the maximum sensitivity in the visualization of the ultrasonic waves, it is convenient to employ an experimental configuration in which the laser beam is parallel to the wavefront refracted in the air. The layout hence enables identification of patterns as-230 sociated with specific acoustic waves, namely the direct (pitch-cath) or the reflected ones (pulse-echo) also in a context of defect detection [28]. For example, Figure 3 depicts the experimental arrangement for detecting a surface wave propagating on a plate with maximum 235 sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%