2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06017-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cr(VI) removal performance from aqueous solution by Pseudomonas sp. strain DC-B3 isolated from mine soil: characterization of both Cr(VI) bioreduction and total Cr biosorption processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At low pHs, the biomass surface is highly protonated, offering a large amount of positive charges that attract chromium anions. Obviously, this pH range cannot be used with living biomass; however, the biological activity of this type of biomass can compensate for this inconvenience, especially using resistant strains [85]. This behavior can be applied to other metals such as dysprosium [88], arsenic [89] or tungsten [20].…”
Section: Chromium (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low pHs, the biomass surface is highly protonated, offering a large amount of positive charges that attract chromium anions. Obviously, this pH range cannot be used with living biomass; however, the biological activity of this type of biomass can compensate for this inconvenience, especially using resistant strains [85]. This behavior can be applied to other metals such as dysprosium [88], arsenic [89] or tungsten [20].…”
Section: Chromium (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cr(VI) causes many diseases in humans, such as skin rash, kidney and liver damage, internal bleeding, dental abnormalities, respiratory disorders, and lung cancer (Martone et al 2013). Cr(VI) is 100 times toxic and 1000 times more mutagenic compared to Cr(III) (Chang et al 2019). Reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in Cr(VI) removal is therefore an effective method for signi cantly reducing the toxic effect of Cr(VI) (Long et al 2018;Pan et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cr(VI) is recognized as one of the priority pollutants by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (USEPA 2014). It has been reported that the discharge limit of wastewater containing Cr(VI) made by European Union (EU) to surface waters should be below 0.05 mg/L and that the total concentration of Cr should be reduced below 2 mg/L (Chang et al 2019). The World Health Organization (WHO) has determined the maximum allowable total chromium content in surface water and drinking water to be 0.05 mg/L (WHO 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been suggested that chromium (III) is involved in maintaining the tertiary structure of proteins and inducing DNA conformational changes [34,35]. Thus, biotransformation of chromium (VI) to chromium (III) via microbial or plant metabolism has been considered a feasible and practical process for the detoxification of environmental chromium (VI) contaminants [13][14][15]. However, increasing evidence suggests that chromium (III), although much less toxic than chromium (VI), can also induce cytotoxicity via increased apoptosis and oxidative stress [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevailing view is that chromium (III) is an essential element for carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and that it is noncarcinogenic and much less toxic to most organisms than chromium (VI) [10][11][12]. Thus, the biotransformation of chromium (VI) to chromium (III) via the metabolic pathways of plants and microorganisms has been considered a feasible and practical process to detoxify environmental chromium (VI) contaminants [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%