2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cow traffic in relation to social rank and motivation of cows in an automatic milking system with control gates and an open waiting area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For a large indoor herd of 500 cows, Harms and Wendl (2010) suggested a modular layout, comprising four groups of 125 cows each, milked by two robots; each group split based on individual cow factors such as parity, stage of lactation, milk yield, body condition and social rank, in order to maximize robot utilization efficiency. Smaller groups would minimize the time spent waiting in the pre-milking area, especially for animals with low social ranking within the herd, as they spend significantly longer waiting for access to the milking robot (Melin et al, 2006;Halachmi, 2009). The waiting times for lower ranked cows are likely to be exacerbated in large herd pasture-based AMS, as cows cannot be split into small groups to mitigate the increased competition from having more cows in the waiting yard.…”
Section: Animal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a large indoor herd of 500 cows, Harms and Wendl (2010) suggested a modular layout, comprising four groups of 125 cows each, milked by two robots; each group split based on individual cow factors such as parity, stage of lactation, milk yield, body condition and social rank, in order to maximize robot utilization efficiency. Smaller groups would minimize the time spent waiting in the pre-milking area, especially for animals with low social ranking within the herd, as they spend significantly longer waiting for access to the milking robot (Melin et al, 2006;Halachmi, 2009). The waiting times for lower ranked cows are likely to be exacerbated in large herd pasture-based AMS, as cows cannot be split into small groups to mitigate the increased competition from having more cows in the waiting yard.…”
Section: Animal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influence of provision of concentrate at milking on voluntary cow traffic in a pasture-based automatic milking system V. E. Scott ,* 1 P. C. Thomson , † K. L. Kerrisk ,* and S. C. Garcia * Similarly in AMS, social order can influence access to the robotic milking unit, where cows of lower social status have been shown to wait longer in front of the robotic milking unit (Lexer et al, 2009) and spend more time in the waiting area (Melin et al, 2006) than cows of higher social status. Long premilking waiting times may negatively affect cow time budgets and production and, in extreme cases, also create welfare concerns, such as the development of lameness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conforme Wiktorsson e Sørensen (2004), os rebanhos consistem de vacas com baixos e altos VD no ranking social e isso influencia os padrões de ordenha, dependendo da posição social. Segundo Melin et al (2006), a motivação para a alimentação pode desencadear efeitos na posição social. Danielsson (2012) reportou que as vacas com dominância mais alta tiveram diferença significativa na forma da curva de lactação, quando comparadas às de baixa dominância, explicada por um intervalo de ordenha mais curto, ou seja, foram ordenhadas mais vezes por dia.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Os autores acima citados relataram que vacas com baixa dominância passaram mais tempo de espera em frente à EO. De fato, Melin et al (2006) relataram que vacas de baixa posição social passaram mais tempo na sala de espera e menos tempo na área de descanso do que vacas de alta posição social.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified