County child poverty rates in the US: a spatial regression approach

Abstract

We apply methods of exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) and spatial regression analysis to examine intercounty variation in child poverty rates in the US. Such spatial analyses are important because regression models that exclude explicit specification of spatial effects, when they exist, can lead to inaccurate inferences about predictor variables. Using county-level data for 1990, we re-examine earlier published results [Friedman and Lichter (Popul Res Policy Rev 17:91–109, 1998)]. We find that formal tests for spatial autocorrelation among county child poverty rates confirm and quantify what is obvious from simple maps of such rates: the risk of a child living in poverty is not (spatially) a randomly distributed risk at the county level. Explicit acknowledgment of spatial effects in an explanatory regression model improves considerably the earlier published regression results, which did not take account of spatial autocorrelation. These improvements include: (1) the shifting of “wrong sign” parameters in the direction originally hypothesized by the authors, (2) a reduction of residual squared error, and (3) the elimination of any substantive residual spatial autocorrelation. While not without its own problems and some remaining ambiguities, this reanalysis is a convincing demonstration of the need for demographers and other social scientists to examine spatial autocorrelation in their data and to explicitly correct for spatial externalities, if indicated, when performing multiple regression analyses on variables that are spatially referenced. Substantively, the analysis improves the estimates of the joint effects of place-influences and family-influences on child poverty. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006Child poverty, Exploratory spatial data analysis, Spatial error models, Spatial lag models, Spatial regression,

With a little help from my neighbours: A spatial analysis of the impact of local campaigns at the 2010 British general election

“…(Cutts and Webber, 2010). Such non-independencemay be due to, amongst other things, feedback forces, 2 as well as grouping forces (Voss et al, 2006;Anselin, 2001;Wrigley et al, 1996). 3 The assumption that geographically contiguous parliamentary constituencies with similar party vote shares might be influenced by grouping forces, such as intense party activism,is not entirely new, however.Previous work had found that the Liberal Democrats improved their local election support following intensive activism in areas surrounding those where they won at the previous contest (Dorling, Rallings and Thrasher, 1998).…”

The Landscape of Poverty in Nigeria: A Spatial Analysis Using Senatorial Districts- level Data

“…Generally, poverty has attracted a lot o f attention fro m the academia and non-academia globally. Few recent studies are based on the premise that individuals and households with co mmon characteristics sometimes are found clustered together either by choice or because they are constrained to co-locate by coercive operation of social, econo mic, geographic or political forces [14]. Identification of these households has been made possible through the advancement in spatial analytical techniques; which has also enables spatial pattern of poverty (concentration of poverty rates and outliers) to be quantified [15], [16], [17].…”

“…The categorization of spatial concentration into high or lo w poverty rate neighbourhood is in relat ionship with average national poverty rate. Most counties in US are found in the high-high and lo w-low subregions [14]. That is, the counties whose poverty rate is above (below) the average poverty rate are surrounded by counties with poverty rate above (below) average national poverty rate.…”

“…A comb ination of processes (socioeconomic, polit ical, demographic and geographic) operating in space over time has somehow conspired to partition countries into large reg ions of high and large regions of lo w poverty-with occasional ''island'' geographic units here and there that are very different fro m their neighbors [14].…”

Progress in Spatial Demography

“…10 In a similarly important synthesis, Castro (2007) provided detailed reviews of spatial perspectives and model applications structured around demography's core areas-fertility, mortality, migration, and population models-all with a focus on the implications for population policy research. 11 Many of the early adopters of spatial analysis in demography drew upon specific geospatial data sets, utilized non-census data/units of analysis (as well as census data/units), and adopted fairly rudimentary forms of spatial analysis-from overlay, buffering, and spatial joins (for building contextual databases and descriptive analysis)-but only a relatively small number had adopted more advanced geostatistics and point pattern analysis (e.g., Castro et al 2006) and spatial regression (e.g., Morenoff 2003;Voss et al 2006;Chi and Zhu 2008). Increasingly, researchers across the population sciences are developing innovative ways to both harness and analyze geospatial data on the social, built, and physical environment contexts of individual lives.…”