2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Count, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria recovered from dental solid waste in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some studies focusing on hospital and dental waste, although very few discuss specific aspects such as their potential biological risks, specially their fungi content. Previous results of our group (Vieira et al., , ) and other studies (Madsen, Alwan, Ørberg, Uhrbrand, & Jørgensen, ) proved the presence of different species of viable bacteria and also of some yeast inside biomedical waste. To widen the discussion on the possible risks to waste workers, this study proposed to investigate fungal strains recovered from dental waste, comparing with those samples isolated from waste workers' tissues (hands and nasal mucosa) and their work wear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There are some studies focusing on hospital and dental waste, although very few discuss specific aspects such as their potential biological risks, specially their fungi content. Previous results of our group (Vieira et al., , ) and other studies (Madsen, Alwan, Ørberg, Uhrbrand, & Jørgensen, ) proved the presence of different species of viable bacteria and also of some yeast inside biomedical waste. To widen the discussion on the possible risks to waste workers, this study proposed to investigate fungal strains recovered from dental waste, comparing with those samples isolated from waste workers' tissues (hands and nasal mucosa) and their work wear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…in clinical waste. Vieira et al [23] detected various types bacterial agents in dental waste including Enterobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Serratia spp., Proteus mirabilis , Escherichia spp., Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported recovery of S. paucimobilis and S. maltophilia from the same biofilm (39) suggests that gene transfer is possible between these organisms. A recent report of dental solid waste harboring S. maltophilia (347) raises new questions about the viability and persistence of this opportunistic pathogen and whether DNA transfer from this organism can increase the potential pathogenicity and virulence of other microorganisms.…”
Section: Molecular Ecology and Stenotrophomonas Infection Gene Transfmentioning
confidence: 99%