1990
DOI: 10.1080/00346769000000011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could Marshall Or Veblen Embrace Economic Justice for all?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current political and social climate of extreme market liberalism, trade liberalism and corporatism, there is even greater danger of further marginalisation of economic and social rights. This is because renewed emphasis on the free market, free trade and a pecuniary notion of competition/competitiveness is creating polarisation between efficiency and equity (Scaperlanda, 1990).…”
Section: Mariama Williams Kamaramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current political and social climate of extreme market liberalism, trade liberalism and corporatism, there is even greater danger of further marginalisation of economic and social rights. This is because renewed emphasis on the free market, free trade and a pecuniary notion of competition/competitiveness is creating polarisation between efficiency and equity (Scaperlanda, 1990).…”
Section: Mariama Williams Kamaramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This polarisation between efficiency and equity accepts the initial distribution of resources within and between countries and believes that the market (and free trade) generates an optimal distribution of resources and capabilities (Neuberger, 1993). This neo-liberal economic, political and social paradigm is biased towards a particular kind of individual freedom, fervently holds to a pecuniary version of economic freedom (Scaperlanda, 1990), and preaches the unquestioned benefits of specialisation. In practice, corporate rights are valued over human life, and there is very little respect for human dignity.…”
Section: Mariama Williams Kamaramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current political and social climate of extreme market liberalism, trade liberalism and corporatism, there is even greater danger of further marginalisation of economic and social rights. This is because renewed emphasis on the free market, free trade and a pecuniary notion of competition/competitiveness is creating polarisation between efficiency and equity (Scaperlanda, 1990). This polarisation between efficiency and equity accepts the initial distribution of resources within and between countries and believes that the market (and free trade) generates an optimal distribution of resources and capabilities (Neuberger, 1993).…”
Section: Mariama Williams Kamaramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because renewed emphasis on the free market, free trade and a pecuniary notion of competition/competitiveness is creating polarisation between efficiency and equity (Scaperlanda, 1990). …”
Section: Mariama Williams Kamaramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This neo-liberal economic, political and social paradigm is biased towards a particular kind of individual freedom, fervently holds to a pecuniary version of economic freedom (Scaperlanda, 1990), and preaches the unquestioned benefits of specialisation. In practice, corporate rights are valued over human life, and there is very little respect for human dignity.…”
Section: Mariama Williams Kamaramentioning
confidence: 99%