Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Sciences and Engineering (UNCECO 2017
DOI: 10.7712/120217.5364.16982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cossan Software: A Multidisciplinary and Collaborative Software for Uncertainty Quantification

Abstract: Abstract. Computer-aided modelling and simulation is now widely recognised as the third 'leg' of scientific method, alongside theory and experimentation. Many phenomena can be studied only by using computational processes such as complex simulations or analysis of experimental data. In addition, in many engineering fields computational approaches and virtual prototypes are used to support and drive the design of new components, structures and systems.A general purpose software for uncertainty quantification an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a direct result from the truncation of the random variable that is associated to each predicted response. Also, since during the training of the IPM, the explicit constraint y i < y i < y i , i = 1, ..., n y is included, a similar observation can be made in this context, as demonstrated in [24] and [19]. Therefore, only the extreme bounds of the predicted response intervals need to be considered in the evaluation of the failure probability.…”
Section: Interval Predictor Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is a direct result from the truncation of the random variable that is associated to each predicted response. Also, since during the training of the IPM, the explicit constraint y i < y i < y i , i = 1, ..., n y is included, a similar observation can be made in this context, as demonstrated in [24] and [19]. Therefore, only the extreme bounds of the predicted response intervals need to be considered in the evaluation of the failure probability.…”
Section: Interval Predictor Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[8]), the reader is instead referred to the position paper [9]. See also [2,10,11,12,13] for other recent contributions on IPMs, and [14,15] for a software and a fast algorithm.…”
Section: Discussion On Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Monte Carlo simulation produced the closest results to the uncertainty process with many iterations (Stepanov and Amosov, 2007). Several studies used it to model GHI uncertainty, such as Alfi et al, 2017;Patelli et al, 2017;andYin andChen, 2017. Alfi et al, 2017 used the Monte Carlo simulation to model solar irradiance uncertainty.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%