Corticotomy-Assisted Orthodontic Treatment: Review

Hassan, Ali; Al-Fraidi, Ahmad A; Al-Saeed, Samar H.

doi:10.2174/1874210601004010159

Cited by 111 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…7 Thus, accelerating orthodontic tooth movement and the resulting shortening of the treatment duration would be quite beneficial. To date, several novel modalities have been reported to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, including low-level laser therapy, 8,9 pulsed electromagnetic fields, 10 electrical currents, 11 corticotomy, 12,13 distraction osteogenesis, [14][15][16] and mechanical vibration. 17 However, pertinent results are inconclusive, and some are unreliable, which may bias clinicians' understandings and mislead clinical practice.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Long

Pyakurel

Wang

et al. 2012

The Angle Orthodontist

177

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Materials and Methods: We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index, CENTRAL, and SIGLE from January 1990 to August 2011 for randomized or quasirandomized controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. The processes of study search, selection, and quality assessment were conducted independently in duplicate by two review authors. Original outcome data, if possible, underwent statistical pooling by using Review Manager 5. Results: Through a predefined search strategy, we finally included nine eligible studies. Among them, five interventions were studied (ie, low-level laser therapy, corticotomy, electrical current, pulsed electromagnetic fields, and dentoalveolar or periodontal distraction). Six outcomes were evaluated in these studies (ie, accumulative moved distance or movement rate, time required to move tooth to its destination, anchorage loss, periodontal health, pulp vitality, and root resorption). Conclusion: Among the five interventions, corticotomy is effective and safe to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, low-level laser therapy was unable to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, current evidence does not reveal whether electrical current and pulsed electromagnetic fields are effective in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement, and dentoalveolar or periodontal distraction is promising in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement but lacks convincing evidence. (Angle Orthod. 2013;83:164-171.)

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Long

Pyakurel

Wang

et al. 2012

The Angle Orthodontist

177

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In light of some reports, this procedure helps orthodontic tooth movement by accelerated bone metabolism due to controlled surgical damage, so it is called corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. 15,16 According to Bhattacharya et al, corticotomy techniques reduce the time taken for re-eruption when compared with conventional orthodontic treatment by 30-50%. 16 In case 2 presentation, despite decortication and luxation, orthodontic extrusion was unsatisfactory and ankylosis was observed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Different outcomes of managing severe intruded immature permanent incisors: A report of two cases

Marczuk-Kolada¹,

Łuczaj-Cepowicz²,

Pawińska³

2017

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intrusion is a very severe injury involving damage to the periodontal ligament, cementum, alveolar bone, and neurovascular pulp supply. Current management strategies include passive repositioning by waiting for the tooth to regain its preinjury position, and active repositioning, i.e., immediate surgical repositioning or repositioning with traction.This report describes the interdisciplinary management of complete intrusions of the maxillary right central incisors with an immature open apex in 2 different patients of a similar age but with different outcomes. The most likely causes of these differences were: ankylosis; inflammatory root resorption; and the systemic condition of the 2 nd patient. A number of preinjury and injury factors have a significant influence on the healing outcome. According to this report, prognosis after intrusive luxation appears to depend not only on the severity of the trauma, stage of root development and treatment method, but also probably on the patient's systemic condition. Therefore, the patient's current complex medical history should be taken into consideration as a factor significantly affecting the healing outcome and long-term prognosis.

show abstract

“…Therefore, indications, contraindications and complications are similar in both techniques. 7 Another aim was to cross the "sand clock shaped" cortical bone barrier with minimum damage to the tooth structure. Even though the mentioned surgical procedure was anticipated to decrease the risks associated with tooth movement into a relatively longer space, only controlled clinical studies can provide usable data about the remaining risks.…”

Section: 5mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reader's Forum

Guo

2014

Korean J Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

First, I congratulate and appreciate the authors of this case report for bringing up an inspiring solution for a critical clinical issue. Based on the present case, I have two major concerns.Q1. Miniscrew implants have become a popular method for providing skeletal orthodontic anchorage. However, reported success rates of these devices vary from less than 50% to more than 95%, while the overall failure rate of miniscrew implants was 13.5%. Thank you for your kind interest on the subject. A1.A lingual arch was planned and placed presurgically in order to withstand such complications. But when the premolar and molar teeth positions and the distance they were moved forward were considered, loss of anchorage was almost unavoidable even with such a device. There is not much choice of devices other than mini-screws when "absolute anchorage" is needed for mandibular teeth. As you may confirm, a single lingual arch was not the best choice in such a case but the space was mostly closed when the mini-screws were lost. Loss of the screws could be attributed to many factors including bone physiology itself. The tissue formation rate was estimated to be two to ten times faster than normal regeneration process around the field of corticotomy area. 3 This change in bone turn-over rate can also affect the interaction between the miniscrew implants and the bone, however detailed studies READER'S FORUMMete Ozer, Berat Serdar Akdeniz, Mahmut Sumer Alveolar ridge expansion-assisted orthodontic space closure in the mandibular posterior region.

show abstract

Corticotomy-Assisted Orthodontic Treatment: Review

Cited by 111 publications

References 43 publications

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

Different outcomes of managing severe intruded immature permanent incisors: A report of two cases

Reader's Forum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About