2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
55
4
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
12
55
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study , it was revealed that cortical bone thickness increased from anterior to posterior on the buccal side of the mandible, these findings are consistent with studies by (6,36,35) .The pattern can be explained by masticatory force distribution within the mandible. The force developed during biting increases from anterior teeth to molars (37 ,38) .…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the current study , it was revealed that cortical bone thickness increased from anterior to posterior on the buccal side of the mandible, these findings are consistent with studies by (6,36,35) .The pattern can be explained by masticatory force distribution within the mandible. The force developed during biting increases from anterior teeth to molars (37 ,38) .…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is believed that patients with hyperdivergence, a long face, have thinner bone both on the buccal and the oral sides compared with individuals with a short face type (hypodivergence) [17, 36, 37]. This was confirmed by Gracco et al as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the pre-molar and molar region, cortical bone is significantly thicker and cancellous bone is wider in patients with a low vertical facial height than in patients with a hyperdivergent profile. (Horner et al 2012). Swasty et al 2011; reported a significant higher cortical bone thickness, with increasing age.…”
Section: % Cancellous Bonementioning
confidence: 91%