2014
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible

Abstract: Very cortical bone could jeopardize the long-term stability of the marginal bone surrounding implants placed in the posterior region of the mandible. A correlation between marginal bone loss and the proportion of cortical bone was demonstrated around Brånemark implants. At present, no comparable studies are available, and therefore, it cannot be excluded that similar events take place around other implant systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peri‐implant MBL plays a key role for long‐term implant stability . According to the established success criteria MBL should not exceed 1.5 mm after the first year of loading and not 0.2 mm in the subsequent years .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peri‐implant MBL plays a key role for long‐term implant stability . According to the established success criteria MBL should not exceed 1.5 mm after the first year of loading and not 0.2 mm in the subsequent years .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widths of the cortical and cancellous bone were measured in the region with the greatest extent. The proportion of cortical and cancellous bone was calculated for each bone site, following the methodology described by Simons and colleagues …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient was not exposed to other risk factors, and implant placement protocol was followed stringently, so the cause of the complication became somewhat elusive. Although presence of bacteria is out of the question, there may be factors that could lead to infection secondary to bone viability issues 6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid popularization of implant treatment has been accompanied by an increased number of failures and the obvious need to develop predictable protocols to prevent and treat implant complications 1 . Bacteria seem to be the primary etiologic agent; 2 however, systemic and/or behavioral factors, 3 occlusal factors, 4 foreign body reactions to dental cement, 5 bone quality, 6 and characteristics of the soft tissue 7 may impact implant success. Different treatments have been proposed 8,9 with limited long‐term reports that span 15 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%