2022
DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2045308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of digital flow peak with spirometry in children with and without asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, this suggest that ePFMs have comparable findings to spirometers, as shown by studies that compared ePFMs and spirometers. 16,17 Compared with Nigerian studies where PEF was measured with mini-Wright mPFM, our PEF was higher than 212 L/min reported by Agaba et al 9 among Nigerian children Jos plateau (Northern Nigeria) and 216 L/min reported by Adeniyi 8 in Abuja (North-central Nigeria), but lower than 257 L/min reported by Mohammed et al 37 in Kano (Northern Nigeria). These variations may reflect device types, varying inclusion/exclusion criteria, methodological variations or true geographical differences.…”
Section: Mean Pef and Fev 1 Values Of Nigerian Childrencontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps, this suggest that ePFMs have comparable findings to spirometers, as shown by studies that compared ePFMs and spirometers. 16,17 Compared with Nigerian studies where PEF was measured with mini-Wright mPFM, our PEF was higher than 212 L/min reported by Agaba et al 9 among Nigerian children Jos plateau (Northern Nigeria) and 216 L/min reported by Adeniyi 8 in Abuja (North-central Nigeria), but lower than 257 L/min reported by Mohammed et al 37 in Kano (Northern Nigeria). These variations may reflect device types, varying inclusion/exclusion criteria, methodological variations or true geographical differences.…”
Section: Mean Pef and Fev 1 Values Of Nigerian Childrencontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…2,3,14,15 Thus, electronic or digital peak flow meters (ePFMs) which measure both PEF and FEV 1 and have inbuilt quality checks may provide better diagnostic precision than the more ubiquitous mPFMs, especially in the absence of the more expensive spirometers. [16][17][18][19] However, the use of ePFMs may be limited because REs of PEF and FEV 1 specifically measured with ePFM are not available; those measured with mPFMs or spirometers may not be appropriate for ePFMs since device-type is an independent determinant of the fit of REs to a given populations, with consequent risk of mis-classification, mis-diagnosis and over-/under-treatment. 20,21 To determine the REs most appropriate for clinical use of ePFM for LF measurement among Nigerian school-age children (6-11 years), we compared ePFM-measured PEF and FEV 1 with local and foreign equations, including the multi-ethnic Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) equations comprising four racespecific equations (GLI-African-American , GLI-Caucasian ,GLI-Southeast-Asian , GLI-Northeast-Asian ) and two race-neutral/-composite equations-GLI-Others/mixed and a newGLI-Global now recommended by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) for global bench-marking of LF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies also described updates in pulmonary function testing. Researchers performed a cross-sectional study to compare newer digital peak flow meters (DPM) to conventional spirometry 12 . Specifically, the authors compared forced expiratory volumes in the first second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow measurement (PEF) for 125 children without asthma and 196 children with asthma.…”
Section: New Methods For Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%