1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00310259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of bone mineral density and femoral neck hardness in bovine and human samples

Abstract: Bone mineral density (BMD) is a predictor of fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a correlation exists between femoral neck BMD and an indicator of mechanical bone strength in human and bovine samples. Human proximal femurs were obtained from seven men and two women undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), mean age 60.3 years. Preoperative BMD measurements of the femoral neck were obtained (Lunar DPX). A 3 cm2 area of interest on each excised femoral neck corresponding to the preop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Age-related changes in tissue hardness and tissue modulus of human bone do not generally occur at these length-scales when considering mean values of multiple indents within a sample (Boivin et al, 2008; Hoffler et al, 2000; Houde et al, 1995; Rho et al, 2002; Zioupos et al, 2008). These elastic properties at the micron length scale are sensitive to tissue age (e.g., higher values for interstitial than for osteonal tissue) (Hoffler et al, 2005; Rho et al, 1999) but not donor age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related changes in tissue hardness and tissue modulus of human bone do not generally occur at these length-scales when considering mean values of multiple indents within a sample (Boivin et al, 2008; Hoffler et al, 2000; Houde et al, 1995; Rho et al, 2002; Zioupos et al, 2008). These elastic properties at the micron length scale are sensitive to tissue age (e.g., higher values for interstitial than for osteonal tissue) (Hoffler et al, 2005; Rho et al, 1999) but not donor age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tissue-level H and E from microindentation [3034] and nanoindentation of cortical bone [34, 35] do not vary with donor age, though they do generally increase with tissue age [36, 37] or degree of mineralization (Table 1). As for in vivo microindentations of human tibia, the impact-derived BMSi was observed to increase with age (40 to 85 yo) when persons with and without fractures were included in the correlation [38].…”
Section: Independence Of Tissue-level Mechanical Properties From Donomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of bone mineralization has been described to be a decisive parameter for bone quality and stability [8,13,14]. Studies from the Norwegian national hip register suggest that regional bone loss might contribute to the risk of aseptic loosening [5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%